via lookbook.nu
Posted via email from Dogmeat
July 24, 2010
Scary George Jones Ebay 78s
Benvenuto in YouTube!
Lingua consigliata (preferenza impostata dal sistema): Italiano
Filtro località consigliato (preferenza impostata dal sistema): Italia
Il filtro località mostra i tuoi video più visti dal Paese o dalla regione selezionati in elenchi quali I più visti e nei risultati di ricerca.Per cambiare una di queste preferenze, utilizza i link nella parte inferiore della pagina.
Fai clic su "OK" per accettare queste impostazioni oppure su "Annulla" per impostare la tua lingua di preferenza su "Italiano" e il filtro località su "A livello mondiale".
Posted via email from Dogmeat
Wikipedians Discover New Word in Preamble to United States Constitution...and it's CLUEBOT! PLUS There's a guy searching for 'the the' Help talk:Searching
 | This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Sections with no replies in 30 days are automatically moved. |
[edit] weird false positive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=cluebot finds the word "cluebot" in Preamble to the United States Constitution/text. Examination of that page, including a fair amount of its revision history, doesn't show any occurrences of that word.
66.127.52.47 (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- You need to look at the source of the page. If you click the "edit" button you will see it is indeed there as a template parameter. --rainman (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. 66.127.52.47 (talk) 09:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
[edit] phrase search too helpful
I'm looking for occurrences of the phrase "the the", an error that occurs in many articles (ref). But even with the query in double quotes, searching returns a big list of articles containing two "the"'s that are not adjacent. Is there a way to say "treat this query as meaning exactly what it says"? 69.228.170.24 (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- It appears to work correctly for me but the displayed text on the search results page is often not the occurrence of "the the". Can you give an example of a page without "the the" or variations like
the [[The ...]]in the wiki source? Note that search results are dated and it should be an example with no occurrence in the page version of that date. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Noo! Where's the search bar that used to be here?
This page was the only one I could use for the old search bar without creating an account. Can we have it re-added just to this page please? 83.142.0.150 (talk) 01:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Using the search to directly get to a page
Well, that's fine, but how does one use the search WITHOUT directly getting to a page? The old style had a useful distinction between "Go" and "Search". And something seems to have gone wrong with the guidance at the top of this page. 45ossington (talk) 09:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the guidance at the top of this page seems to answer your question - if you want to force a search, click on the "containing" link at the bottom of the suggestions list that appears.--Kotniski (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I see now. Many thanks. I have tried to make it a bit clearer for techno-idiots like myself, but feel free to revert if you think the additions are counter-productive.
- 45ossington (talk) 11:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
-
- The list that drops down from ny search box has no "containing" option. Am I missing something? Using Iceweasel (Firefox) on Debian Linux. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- I believe they've temporarily reverted the code, as the new code had many problems (see various threads at WP:VPT). -- Quiddity (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:46, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- I believe they've temporarily reverted the code, as the new code had many problems (see various threads at WP:VPT). -- Quiddity (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- The list that drops down from ny search box has no "containing" option. Am I missing something? Using Iceweasel (Firefox) on Debian Linux. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Knockout drum and gas scrubber
What is the difference between gas scrubber and knockout drum by process and construction wise? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arupukkottai (talk • contribs) 06:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Is it OK
Is it OK to promote "Delay in updating the search index" to level 2? We would like to link to it in a new template here. It doesn't send the right message to link to the section above; I tried this, but it didn't give me the desired result. If I'm forming the link wrong, I'm happy if someone shows me how to link to the level 3 heading, but I thought perhaps I needed a level 2 heading.--
via en.wikipedia.org
Posted via email from Dogmeat
Category:Sexual fetishism - Don't you REALLY Hate the Freaky Stocking Men Who Think They're Fooling Dudes when they Post Pictures of their AWFUL Legs on Wikimedia Commons and YouTube?
Media in category "Sexual fetishism"
The following 40 files are in this category, out of 40 total.
Posted via email from Dogmeat
Posterous Picks Up Keith Richards Rolling Stones YouTube Video From Wiki Page External Link via Google Reader RSS Send-To and I Like It!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Rolling Stones
Mick Jagger, Keith Richards
Ronnie Wood, Charlie WattsBackground information Origin London, England Genres Rock, rock and roll, blues-rock, rhythm and blues, blues Years active 1962–present Labels Decca, London, Rolling Stones, Virgin, ABKCO, Interscope, Polydor Website www.RollingStones.com Members Mick Jagger
Keith Richards
Charlie Watts
Ronnie WoodFormer members Brian Jones
Ian Stewart
Mick Taylor
Bill WymanThe Rolling Stones are an English rock band formed in April 1962 by guitarist and harmonica player Brian Jones, pianist Ian Stewart, vocalist Mick Jagger and guitarist Keith Richards. Bassist Bill Wyman and drummer Charlie Watts completed the early lineup.
Jones initially led the band, but Jagger and Richards assumed band leadership after becoming prolific hit songwriters and after Jones became increasingly erratic. In 1969 Mick Taylor joined the band on guitar shortly before Jones' untimely death. Since Taylor quit in 1974, guitarist Ronnie Wood has been with the band. Stewart was taken from the official lineup in 1963 to continue as the band's road manager and occasional keyboardist until his death in 1985. Wyman left in 1990 and was replaced by Darryl Jones as the primary bassist.
The Rolling Stones were first popular in Europe and became popular in North America during the British Invasion of the early sixties. The Rolling Stones have released 22 studio albums in the United Kingdom (24 in the United States), eight concert albums (nine in the US) and numerous compilations; and have album sales estimated at more than 200 million worldwide.[1] Sticky Fingers (1971) began a string of eight consecutive studio albums reaching number one in the United States. Their latest album, A Bigger Bang, was released in 2005. In 1989 the Rolling Stones were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and in 2004 they ranked number 4 in Rolling Stone magazine's 100 Greatest Artists of All Time. In 2008, Billboard magazine ranked the Rolling Stones at number ten on "The Billboard Hot 100 Top All-Time Artists", and as the second most successful group in the Billboard Hot 100 chart.[2]
After signing to Decca Records in 1963, the band changed their name from "The Rollin' Stones" to "The Rolling Stones".[3] Band members and others often refer to the band as "The Stones".
Posted via email from Dogmeat
Talk:Dog meat
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no>assessing the article against each criterion.
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no>
| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no>
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no>
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no>
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no>
via en.wikipedia.org
Posted via email from Dogmeat
Facebook Will Rogers' Like-Loving Einstein's Code Harder to Decipher than a WWII Navajo Barracks
Since it launched in April, the Like button has given you the opportunity to make your websites more social in just a few steps. Today, we’re releasing more features for the Like button to add even more value to your site.
- Commenting for the iFrame version
- Publishing to connected users via the Graph API
- More robust analytics
Commenting Now Enabled with IFrame Version
Now, when a user adds a comment to the iFrame version of the Like button, a larger, more prominent story will be shared with the user’s friends. In the past, we’ve seen comments result in increased distribution and referral traffic. To enable this feature, ensure that you are using
layout="standard"and the width of the button is at least 450 pixels. Take a look at this example.
Publishing to Connected Users via Graph API
We encourage websites with objects that people may want to more permanently connect with, such as a brand or product, to publish relevant updates to its connected users. For example, publish a special offer to users who have liked a specific product. Simply add a few Open Graph tags to your Web page and click on the Admin Link (only visible to admins) to use the Publisher.
If you’re publishing to more than a handful of Pages, you now have the ability to publish to multiple Open Graph Pages via the Graph API. Just ensure that the
fb:app_id<meta> tag is specified on the Web page and do the following.First, get an access token for your application:
curl -F type=client_cred \ -F client_id=your_app_id \ -F client_secret=your_app_secret \ https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_tokenUsing this access token and the URL of your page, you can publish to users via the API with:
curl -F 'access_token=...' \ -F 'message=Hello Likers' \ -F 'id=http://www.myopengraphpage.com/page1.html' \ https://graph.facebook.com/feedWe’ve updated our documentation with these new features.
Analytics
We recently added the
refandsourceparameters to help you test and optimize Like button performance on your website (read more about the attributes).For instance, you can now easily A/B test different types and placements of the Like button to determine the implementation that maximizes referral traffic to your site.Frequently Asked Questions
Which Like button is most effective for my Web page?
Use the ref attribute to help you test different placements and types of Like buttons. Append the
ref=""attribute to the Like button, making sure that the value you choose is less than 50 characters (a-z, A-Z, 0-9, + / = - . : _). Here are two examples:<fb:like ref="top_left"> <iframe src="... &ref=top_left">When a user clicks a link back to your website, we will append
&fb_ref=""to the referrer URL. Links from aggregated News Feed stories will contain all ref parameters separated with commas.Where on Facebook did the link get clicked?
When you use the ref parameter, we will also add a new
fb_sourceparameter to our referrer URLs, which includes the stream type ('home', 'profile', 'search', 'other') where the click occurred and the story type ('oneline', 'multiline') concatenated with an underscore. For example:http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?fb_ref=top_left&fb_source=profile_onelineWe sanitize referrer URLs from Facebook to protect user privacy, but this parameter allows us to remove personally identifiable information while still exposing anonymous, yet useful data for developers interested in tracking and optimizing the performance of their Like buttons.
Austin Haugen, a product manager on Facebook Platform, hopes you like the Like button updates.
Posted via email from Dogmeat
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)