LDH,  Attorney General Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) dis-enrolled Louisiana Legislative Auditor (LLA), federal  CMS, HHS Inspector General General Accounting Office

 

Informal Hearing – When there is no dispute regarding the material facts of the violation, the hearing is deemed informal.

1. Essentially, the defendant agrees with the facts and conclusions presented by the agency board when reviewing their violation or charges.
2. They also relinquish their right to further dispute the charges after the informal hearing.
3. The only purpose of an informal hearing is to decide the penalty for the violation.
4. The defendant uses an informal hearing to introduce mitigating factors that might influence a lighter punishment or even to avoid disciplinary sanction of their license.
5. Some mitigating factors would involve successful treatment program completion as well as Federal Agencies warn to prosecute opportunistic acts of process,

 

1. by discrimination or exploitation of Coronavirus, pandemic retaliation, under federal protection, healthcare providers fraudulent billing, discrimination, underserved Medicaid CMS website.

 

Mark Zielinski MD.

acts of discrimination, fraud, gratuitous defiance of current ability to safely function in the professional practices of that certification.

1. 
   
2. 
   

Formal Hearing– When the defendant denies allegations or accusations of violations that could call for sanctions of their professional license, they might opt for a formal hearing before their governing board or agency.

The defendant will be required to identify and dispute specific facts presented in the agencies investigation and determination of charges.

This type of hearing runs similarly to criminal trials with some of the same rights, including invocation of the 5th The agency must be able to prove their case using Florida’s Rules of Evidence.

The standard of proof can often be higher than the agency can provide, while the defendant doesn’t need to prove anything.

The standard of proof for a hearing where an agency is seeking to revoke or sanction a license typically requires higher proof than a civil suit would, though not always quite as high as the “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden of a criminal court.

3. Is the corrective action superficial or inadequate, or is the corrective action adequate and systemic? • Has the hospital implemented the corrective intervention(s) or action(s)? • Has the hospital taken a QAPI approach to the corrective action to ensure monitoring, tracking and sustainability?General Procedures Each State agency and Federal Regional Office should follow directives in the State Operations Manual.

4. 
   

The procedures include: • Timelines for completing each step of the process; • Responsibilities of the team coordinator and other team members to complete the Form CMS-2567, “Statement of Deficiencies,” following the “Principles of Documentation”Standard or Condition level “only if the facility has submitted an acceptable plan of Correction [POC] for achieving within the healthcare system.Core measure compliance within a reasonable period of time acceptable to the Secretary.” Failure to submit a POC may result in termination of the provider agreement as authorized by 42 CFR 488.28(a) and §489.53(a)(1). After a POC is submitted, the surveying entity makes the determination of the appropriateness of the POC.

1. Exhibit 1, “Medicare/Medicaid Psychiatric Hospital Survey Data,” Form CMS- 724 (this form must be completed by the hospital and survey team through the ruling of the board as stipulated under their own rules, and in violation of state and federal law as a recipient of qualification to receive funding and exemptions to the institution through employment he serves, as well as that of his contracted; moreover, every citizen's protections, of which from discrimination by a State employee operating under the Federal ACA and Medicaid System, at an institution whose tax-free exemption designation).
2. State Employee of Louisiana in his teaching capacity; (4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity; 
3. 
   

 

A CLAIM UNDER CIVIL RICO FOR VIOLATING 18 USC SECTION §1962 [(A) (B) (C) (D)] OF RICO

 

The Defendants, both individually and jointly, constituted a RICO “enterprise,” and that the false information and subsequent diagnoses through forceful manipulation of indelible medical patient record -- the disqualifying diagnoses therein, devastating Psyche, relationships, career, and sense of self-worth through the invalid prescribing of unproven, narcotic complaint, recklessly used in personal animus to facilitate patient termination, using the Federal Government, causing PATIENT permanent damage, destruction of personal worth, and failure in business, through “manufacture of dubious medical diagnoses requiring a regimen of powerful and addictive drugs to be taken in a daily cocktail of mixed, toxic combination--which as of this date, have  been attributed as main factor responsible for diagnosis of patient's Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFL), and co-morbid Kidney Disease,  which SHALL result in the shortening OF PATIENT lifespan by no less than a factor of 10%, and of the remaining years, a quality of life, already lower than it SHOULD, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962

1. 
   

 

1. 20 minutes before I was to patch through for a televisit, I was interrupted by his new office manager, who explained to me that I would not be needing to wait, as Dr.

2. Zielinski had delegated her to inform me, that as of right now, I was no longer to be seen by him--with no referrals, no reason, no information about records or prescriptions for vital pharmaceutical medication.

 

for embezzling almost one million dollars in a Crime so vile and depraved, as to rank with the worst crimes committed in the state of Louisiana, undetected, unprotected, a scandal that would rock the Sisters and their board, John Paul Funes, swindled money from dying pediatric cancer patients at that FMOLHS hospital in a fraudulent scheme for almost a decade--had a forensic audit of FMOLHS not been required to find their own sloppy Medicaid BILLING RECORDS, fraudulent appointments, for illegal enrichment of him and Clinic, records in a shambolic state, he would still be there.

1. That is the precedent in which the Sisters and their executives of this 3.6 billion dollar, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, Catholic charitable 503-(c), Federal Government funded LSU hospital, bragged by them as the largest healthcare system in the state, with 6 hospitals, 1 University, and countless other developments in play throughout the city and state, and with richly profitable (to someone), agreement with Louisiana State University for Agricultural and Mechanical College, the Huey Long flagship institution for higher learning in the state, whose association both benefit, LSU for it sits medical and giving rise to a RICO conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).
2. 18.
3. A CLAIM THAT DEFENDANTS INTERFERED WITH PLAINTIFF’S PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS UNDER THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONS; 20.
4. A CLAIM FOR prohibited self-help, void ab initio 21.
5. violations of the Consumer Fraud Act (cfa) ET SEQ) – UNCONSCIONABLE COMMERCIAL PRACTICES AND TO PROVIDE FALSE REPORT, MANUFACTURE OF FALSE CLAIM IN THE ACTIONABLE OFFENSE OF PATIENT TERMINATION BY DECEPTION and false promises and/or misrepresentations, unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or the knowing, concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely upon such .
6. declared to be an unlawful practice.
7. CFA claim: “(1) unlawful conduct by defendant; (2) an ascertainable loss by plaintiff; and (3) a causal residents, and researchers of all of its medical school both at LSU Baton Rouge and New Orleans, as well as its relationship with Pennington Biomedical Center, all firmly ensuring its completely protected status from claims such as this, therewith Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and the state and federal health marketplaces.
8. CMS collects and analyzes data, produces research, and works to eliminate between the unlawful conduct and the ascertainable loss.” any unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or the knowing, concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression or omission, in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate, or with the subsequent Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) is the program that will determine Medicare payment adjustments.

 

 insolence, to the organization who is responsible for almost all of their 3.6 billion dollar valuation, as well as the ability for its shareholders, board, medical staff, and large non-medical responsible for running a large healthcare organization and hospital (rated 2 stars--nothing to brag about).

1. (OLOL Top Physician Salary: $1 million), depraved not fit to practice medicine,
   
2. 7 The Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans is a public universityon the health sciences and located in New Orleans, Louisiana.
3. It is part of the LSU System and is the home of six schools, 12 Centers of Excellence, and two patient care clinics.
4. 8 I write this for the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Psychiatry Residents, unaware of circumstances which could adversely affect the VIABILITY OF THEIR () DEGREES, THROUGH EXPOSURE IN THE OUTCOME OF ONE OR MORE OF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL INVESTIGATION, OR POSSIBLE TORTIOUSof such person as aforesaid, whether or not any person has in fact been misled, deceived or damaged thereby.
5. .
6. .
7. .
8. “An `unlawful practice’ contravening the CFA may arise from (1) an affirmative act; (2) a knowing omission; or (3) a violation of an administrative regulation.” Courts should construe the CFA liberally in favor of consumers.
9. clinic, coerce the clinic nurse to agree to the wholly false story that ( Allegations of fraud must be pled with specificity and a litigant's failure to do so should result in dismissal of the complaint.
10. requiring any complaint alleging fraud set forth the "particulars of the wrong, with dates and items if necessary, .
11. .
12. .
13. insofar as practicable").
14. Defendants engaged in "knowing concealment, suppression and omission of material facts," and made a false representation of fact and law which FMOLHS OLOL LSU relied upon.
15. void ab initio because it was entered in violation of state law No notice was provided in violation of state law Pre- and POST FRAUD AND civilSUIT, ANY ONE OF WHICH FINDING IN MY FAVOR, HIS GUILT IN THE EGREGIOUS ACTIONS OF FRAUD, MALFEASANCE, SUBORNATION, CONSPIRACYWITH INTENT TO USE, AND USING PATIENTBY HIM TO TERMINATE PATIENT.
16. 9 INTENTIONAL COVER-UP BY COLLEAGUES AT CLINIC, THROUGH THEIR SUBORNING SWORN DUTIES TO REPORT PERNICIOUS AND HARMFUL ACTS of COLLEAGUES AND FELLOW DOCTORS, NO MATTER THE RELATIONSHIP, OR THEIR BELIEF IN COLLEAGUE WITH WHOM THEY, AND WHO IS SUPERVISOR AND PROFESSOR OF THEIR MOST PRESTIGIOUS DEPARTMENT Kathleen Crapanzano, MD Program Director, LSU Psychiatry Residency Program - Baton Rouge and Lannis Tynes, MD.
17. 11 WHICH FINDS THEM IN THE ETHICAL CONUNDRUM OF SUPPORTING LIES AND REMAINING SILENT, ALONG WITH SUPPRESSION OF REPORTING HIS FLAGRANT CONTRAVENTION OF MEDICAL RULES OF ETHICS, WITH THEIR DECISION TO ACTIVELY DISREGARD MY CHARGES, WHILE The PATIENT alleges that the Physicians' Group and the Physicians have not complied with their obligations under these, as they obtained fraudulent and/or illegal or void of healthcare consumer's status in fulfillment of government Medicaid and ACA plans accepted by provider from this Healthcare System FMOLHS void LETTER OF DISMISSAL, ASSESSED NEGLIGENT AND MALICIOUS PUNISHMENT BASED ON UNTRUTHFUL THIRD-PARTYME MY PATIENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS, AND APPEAL, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO CALL FOR AN INVESTIGATION BY AN IMPARTIAL COMMITTEE INTO THE EVENTS AND ALLEGATIONS OF VEHEMENT(SUBSEQUENTLY RECANTED), HAVING BEEN ORIGINALLY PROVIDED BY DELEGATION OF MARK ZIELINSKI, M.D., OFFICE MANAGER, STEPHANIE (LAST NAME UNKNOWN), AND BY TELEPHONIC ATTESTATION FROM HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF LSUHSC - BR PSYCHIATRY DEPT.
18. AND FOR PHYSICIANS GROUP OUTPATIENT CLINIC AT O'DONOVAN, BATON ROUGE, LA, OLOL RMC / FMOLHS, SUBJECT TO DENIAL to bogus charge, not even properly made, and the disheveling moral assault whose wound is such that I can hardly write tothis indictment (this being the 25th time of OF HEALTHCARE AS LAWFULLY REQUIRED BY FMOLHS AGENT, AND CONTEMPORANEOUS WITH TELEPHONIC TRANSMISSION OF).
19. 12 I DEMAND MY RIGHT TO FILE GRIEVANCE FOR GROSS INSUBORDINATION, FRAUD, MALFEASANCE, AND ULTIMATELY FOR PHYSICIAN ABANDONMENT, AN ACTIONABLE AND PRECISE DEFINITION OF EXACTLY EVERY STEP OF UNPROFESSIONAL, UNGAINLY, HESITANT COWARDICE AND DIMINUTION OF CHARACTER OF WHICH A DOCTOR MUST SURELY NEVER IMAGINE TO FALL, BUTSTUMBLING AT THE PRECIPICE, THE DOCTOR WILL TRY EVERYTHING IN HIS POWER TO PREVENT FROM BLOWING UP IN HIS FACE, EVEN IF IT MEANS THE SPECIAL DEPRIVATION OF ANOTHER PERSON'SFOR HEALTHCARE, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, RELIEVING HIM OF ANYOF HONEST AND MORAL DEALINGS OF A RECORDED HISTORY WITH THE VERY SAME CLINIC.
20. 13 OVER A TELEPHONIC DEVICE WITH NO WITNESSES, NO REPORT, UNCORROBORATED, UNREMARKED TO WORKMATES OR HER FROM PROVIDER VIA OFFICE ASSISTANT.
21. WHERE SHE DID OMIT (AS A NEW EMPLOYEE) NUMEROUS PROVISIONS AS DELINEATED BY FEDERAL CMS MEDICAID AND ACA RULES AND LAWS PERTAINING TO THE PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND TO THE HOMELESS ACT, TO BE BEST PRACTICE, THE DOCTOR, THE VERY SKETCHY NON-DETAILED GENERALIZATION OF AN OCCASION OF INVECTIVE, AS LAST RESORT INSTITUTION OF PATIENT TERMINATION (DURING PANDEMIC DECLARED 'PROFANITY, THE LIKES OF WHICH SHE HAD NEVER HEARD' 14 AND APPARENTLY THE LIKES OF WHICH SHE LISTENED TO UNTIL THE END OF UNCONSTRAINED COPROLALIA, WHICH ALTHOUGH, UNREPEATED -- CHARACTERIZED IN MAWKISH GENERALIZATION AS BOTH NON-MALEVOLENT, NON-THREATENING, INCIDENTAL OVERHEARING OF SWEAR WORDS ON A TELEPHONE, AT WORK, WHICH SHE THINKSPOTUS AND GUBENATORIAL STATE OF EMERGENCY STAY AT HOME ORDER), AND DENYING REQUIRED BY LDH, CMS, ACA, AMA, APA, ETC., PROVISION OF AT LEAST 90 DAYS, OR UNTIL HEALTHCARE CONSUMER MAY FIND A DOCTOR WILLING TO PRESCRIBE SUCH MEDICATION, IN MAINTENANCE OF LONG-TIME MEDICAMENT, UPON WHICH PATIENT RECORD AND PHYSICIAN, AS THAT OF PHARMACIST MAY PROVIDE ANY NECESSARY INFORMATION STATE LAW CLAIMS (DEFAMATION, FALSE LIGHT, NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, PAIN AND SUFFERING, LOSS OF CONSORTIUM, CONVERSION, TORTIOUS AND INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE HEALTHCARE ADVANTAGE), CASES DEALING WITH THE LIABILITY OF THE OTHER DOCTORS AS COMPOUNDING THROUGH BLACKBALLING INSTITUTED BY FMOLHS EXECUTIVE OF TWO MONTHS, HAVE BEEN IGNORED BY EVERY ONE OF THREE INSTITUTIONS' ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT AND LEGAL COUNSEL, REPRESENTED HERE AS MS.
22. BOLLINGER, WHEN THROUGH UNOFFICIAL TELEPHONIC HEARING OF GRIEVANCE VOID WRITS, OR VOID JUDGMENT, AS TO LOUISIANA law, the Writ was VOID AB INITIO and as result LSU PSYCHIATRIC CLINIC, FMOLHS WERE GIVEN AND DID READ UNAUTHORIZED PERSONAL CONFIDENTIAL NOTES AND DIAGNOSES FROM MULTIPLE PSYCHIATRIST SESSIONS, BOTH UNDER RESIDENT PSYCHIATRIST AND MARK ZIELINSKI, MD.
23. “[I]n LOUISIANA PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR PRIVILEGED, SENSITIVE, THROUGH CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT AND BY ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL LAW AND PUNISHABLE UNDER LAW AND BY TORTIOUS MEANS, ITS SUBVERSION, WHEREBY IT IS ALSO A MEANS TO ESCAPE JUSTICE IN ITS KNOWLEDGE FOR CIRCUMVENTION OF INTERROGATION BY AGENT OR BY COURT AS TO THE TIME PLACE INSTANCE AND DESCRIPTION OF MATTERS WHEREBY, WITHOUT IT A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD ASSUME THAT ONLY A PERSON WHO WAS ME, BUT IF SO, SHE SATISFACTORILY ENDED OUR, IN REALITY, PLEASANT CONVERSATION ABOUT THE VAGARIES OF WHY ONE PRESCRIPTION HAD BEEN CALLED IN AND FILLED, WHILE THE OTHER ONE REQUESTED TO ACCOMPANY IT HAD BEEN FORGOTTEN, OR PERHAPS, ONLY THOUGHT TO HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY ME ON THE INSUFFERABLE CATCH-ALL UNIVERSAL HOPPER ... INVOLVED PERSONALLY IN THOSE REGARDS WOULD BE PRIVY THROUGH DIRECT EXPERIENCE THOSE INSTANCES AND PRIVATE PERSONAL RECOLLECTIONS AS NOTED BY DOCTORS IN MY CHART, so that to render a DECISION requisite of law must be shown to have been complied with[.]
24. we conclude the requirements in the statute are not merely directory but mandatory, such that the failure to comply with a statutory provision affects subsequent actions.
25. "if there has been a failure to comply with a requirement which is a condition precedent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court." In this case, FMOLHS and/or its acting Healthcare Provider had no personal jurisdiction over Complainant.
26. Office Manager also entered Termination the same day as the final judgment on June 2, 2021 This was in violation of the mandatory state law: provides that in summary termination proceedings "[n]o Provider removal shall issue until expiration after entry of declaration for severance." Termination order and subsequent fraudulent, FORGED, Backdated Dismissal Letter are void for reasons of UTILIZATION OF MOST OFFENDING HIPPA VIOLATION IN THE UNITED STATES AS A REPOSITORY OF USERS IN A NON SECURE OFFICE, WHOSE OUTGOING MESSAGE IS SO LONG THAT IF ANYTHING WERE TO SAVE ITS UNSECURED EASE OF COMPROMISE BY ANY OFFICE WORKER OR ANY HACKER EAGER TO SCORE A PSYCH PATIENTS LIST, FULL OF, AS STATED ON ITS INTERMINABLE OUTGOING MESSAGE, NAMES, SPELLINGS, BIRTH-DATES, PATIENT NAMES, PRESCRIPTION REFILL DETAILS--EVERYTHING NEEDED TO EITHER FAKE A PRESCRIPTION,OUT WHERE AND UNDER WHOSE NAME TO PICK ONE UP AT WHICH DRUGSTORE, AND MANY OTHER NEFARIOUS PLOTS, WHICH IN THE FIVE YEARS IN WHICH I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO ATTEND THE CLINIC 16 necessity to see a psychiatrist used to involve one 'Psych Lite' meds, now required two, no incidents, warnings, or infractions during 8 years with FMOL OLOL Lake Mail SERVICE IN ONE COUNT OF WIRE FRAUD TO DELIVER BY ITS CERTIFIED MAIL AN OFFICIAL LETTER OF THE CLINIC OF FMOLHS AND OF MARK ZIELINSKI, M.D, A DOCUMENT IN WHICH A FORGERY OF MANIPULATION OF OFFICIAL DOCUMENT INTENTIONAL THROUGH MALICIOUS NOTICE OF IMPROPER TERMINATION BY FRAUD THE HEALTHCARE CONSUMER FURTHER, AS TO THE INSTITUTION OF FINAL AVAILABILITY OF ANY SERVICES, AS PROSCRIBED BY CONTENTION IN THIS OFFICIAL DOCUMENT THROUGH BACKDATING LETTER (TO A DATE PROVIDING AT LEAST HALF OF THE 31 DAYS WHICH IT ITSELF ALLOWS, BUT ONLY REALISTICALLY, DOES IT PROVIDE A 14 DAY PERIOD, FROM THE TIME IN WHICH THE HEALTHCARE CONSUMER COULD HAVE, LSU Psychiatry Clinic.
27. 16 (AFTER THE POLICY WIDE DECISION TO PROHIBIT GENERAL PRACTITIONERS FROM PRESCRIBING PSYCH LITE DRUGS, WHICH LASTED UNTIL ABOUT TEN YEARS AGO, WITH THE NEW PROTOCOL AS TOLD TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED EVERYTHING FROM PROZAC TO VALIUM, THAT THEY WERE NOW REQUIRED TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH A PSYCHIATRIST IN ORDER TO CONTINUE TO OBTAIN THE VERY SAME MEDICINES BUT WITH THE ADDED BENEFIT OF THE PSYCHIATRIC
28. WHILE RUINING MY MY LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO CONTINUE TO USE FACILITIES OF OUR LADY OF THE LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WHOSE GOVERNANCE EVEN THE PRESIDENT FINDS HIMSELF MANDATED TO ABIDE, AND WHOSE ONLY OTHER BICAMERAL OFFICE IS THAT OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA WHOSE CHARGE IT IS TO APPOINT, OR REAPPOINT, IF A GOVERNOR HAS LEFT OFFICE, THE CONTINUATION OF THE BOARD, WHICH ALL OF LSU AS A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY, PUBLICLY FUNDED, AND THE FLAGSHIP INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING IN THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, AND ALL OF ITS MYRIAD OFFICES, ASSOCIATIONS, RELATIONSHIPS, BOTH BUSINESS AND ACADEMIC ... 18 MAKE THE STATE EXACTLY WHAT HUEY LONG INTENDED IT TO BE: WHERE THE LIKES OF EARL PENN WARREN COULD TEACH MY MOTHER AN ENGLISH CLASS, AND SHE COULD SAY THAT SHE'D HAD A PULITZER PRIZE WINNING PROFESSOR.
29. WHAT HOOPS ARE JUMPED THROUGH, THAT I, IN ABOARDS, DIRECTORS, GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATORS, PROFESSORIAL ENTITIES OF ACADEMIC CODE OF ETHICS, AND FROM EACH OF THE SEPARATE HEADS OF ALL OF THAT TROIKA OF OLD FASHIONED CORRUPTION TO IMMEDIATE SILENCE OF THE NEWLY SOCIAL MEDIA ENABLED PRESIDENT OF LSU FROM A PERSONAL LETTER TO HIM THROUGH AN OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED COMMUNICATION, TO THE PRESIDENT / CEO OF OLOL FMOLHS 19.
30. Mark Zielinski defiance Federal CDCetc., all bodies responsible maintaining medical ethics by ca.
31. 1945, restructuring pandemic, most and severe action a provider may take most physicians never having initiated throughoutentire.
32. 'best practice'patients rights agreement Physician-Patient termination and termination from practice last resort--and only specified (9) provisions best practices patientto abide or agree to the agreement option of transfer if this is not unacceptable under strictguidelines termination of patient instituted.
33. Mark Zielinski personally employ, cause, direct, and / or authorize clinical nurse / agent / employee unknown), through false allegation coerced by Zielinskihim to weaponize lie that she reported incident of a patient using profanity over a telephone to obtain outcome desired, unceremonious, paperless--devoid of all medical, process, or ethical best practices 22.never personally not spoken to me three months before his cancelled televisit termination delegated by him to office manager Stephanie bowing-out to dismiss long-healthcare consumer fifteen minutes televisit--during a pandemic knowing unknown to her LETTER ON FOLLOWING DAY), AS TO ITS STATED SPARSE PROVISION FOR "EMERGENCY PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ONLY," IN ITS TERMS, AND THEN AS TO THE ANTEDATED FORGERY, AS TO DATE OF CREATION, IT STIPULATES "DATE OF FINAL SERVICE, AND ANY AND ALL ASSOCIATION WITH MARK ZIELISNKI," AND, AS STATED IN LETTER, "ANY OR ALL OTHER SERVICES OF PHYSICIANS AT THAT CLINIC, ANY FUTURE ASSOCIATION," AS TO PATIENT.
34. Void for lack of subject matter, jurisdiction, Healthcare Provider / Agent has no authority adjudicate.
35. As stated above, MARK ZIELINSKI, M.D., Office Manager STEPHANIE (LAST NAME UNKNOWN), had no jurisdiction in which to issue TERMINATION against HEALTHCARE CONSUMER, where PHYSICIAN failed to comply with MEDICAID CMS, ACA notice requirements.
36. Such requirements are required for PATIENT dispossession of protected FEDERALLY PROVIDED HEALTHCARE SERVICES.
37. criminal conspirators (MARK ZIELINSKI, M.D., OFFICE MANAGER; LANNIS LEE TYNES, M.D.; KATHLEEN CRAPANZANO, M.D., MACM; OLOL PHYSICIANS GROUP PSYCHIATRY CLINIC; FMOLHS), failed several statutes BY NOT applying for TERMINATION and/or IMPROPER TERMINATION.
38. Thus, TERMINATION void ab initio for lack of subject matter, as well.
39. FMOLHS failed to obtain mandatory CMS NOTIFICATION in violation of FEDERAL MEDICAID AND ACA RULES for EXECUTION OF DISMISSAL OF PATIENT via OFFICE MANAGER, JUNE 2, 2021, LIABLE FOR TORTIOUS DAMAGES, to explain case produced by DEFENDANT's ORDER, and to show a distinction between an erroneous and a void ORDER.
40. That the OFFICE MANAGER was bound to execute TRANSMISSION, although erroneous, if the EMPLOYER / PHYSICIAN / had no jurisdiction.
41. But when the PHYSICIAN had no jurisdiction, the TRANSMISSION was void, and FMOLHS was LIABLE; NO authority being the same as VOID.
42. NATHAN v.
43. VIRGINIA.
44. 1 U.S. 77 (1 Dall.
45. 77, 1 L.Ed. 44) Examples of covert disruptive behavior include repetitive instances of: Unfair/unreasonable delegation of tasks or assignments (e.g. outside scope of practice or job description) Sarcastic or impatient responses directed at another individual Sabotage Comments that undermine a patient’s trust in other caregivers or the institution Refusal to answer questions, respond to calls, or return pages in a timely manner Below is a more detailed explanation of healthcare fraud scenarios under the False Claims Act.
46. A.
47. FALSE BILLING Billing for services not rendered or products not delivered.
48. Misrepresenting services rendered or product provided (e.g., upcoding, inappropriate coding).
49. Also, misrepresenting the nature of the patient’s condition (e.g., DRG fraud, DRG creep).
50. Falsifying records to meet or continue to meet the conditions of participation; this includes the alteration of dates, the forging of physicians’ signatures, and the adding of additional information after the fact.
51. This is somewhat common with Durable Medical Equipment (DME) fraud.
52. Debarment US government action to prevent companies and individuals from conducting business with the federal government.
53. One federal agency's decision to debar a company or individual applies to the entire government.
54. Debarment can be based on, among other things: Conviction.
55. Civil judgment.
56. Allegations that do not result in a personal liability lie malfeasance patient lemon-dropping, agent principal agent termination without get hands dirty 23.evidence belated institution of impartial committee FMOLHS, by law should have in place, after recent embezzlement, wire-fraud conviction of CEO / Foundation President Children's Hospital cancer patients, even if true, ridiculous by comparison, in, claim OLOL-or civil judgment.
57. For a complete list of causes for debarment and suspension, respectively, see 48 C.F.R. § 9.406-2 and 48 C.F.R. § 9.407-2. For more information on suspension or debarment from government contracts, see Practice Note, Acquiring a Federal Government Contractor: Avoiding Pitfalls.
58. A policy prohibiting workplace violence that outlines the procedures for reporting threats or violent acts and prohibits retaliation for complaints.
59. Ethics Adjudicatory Board Pursuant to La.
60. R.S. 49:992.1, La.
61. R.S. 42:1141.5 and LAC I:III.801, et seq., the Ethics Adjudicatory Board (EAB) conducts public hearings to receive evidence on facts alleged in formal charges brought by the Louisiana Board of Ethics (Board) and determines whether any violation of law within the jurisdiction of the Board has occurred.
62. The EAB is a decision-making body composed of impartial administrative law judges who are employed by DAL, not the Board.
63. Defense for Charges of Healthcare Fraud It shouldn’t be surprising to learn that fraud can often occur in the healthcare industry, one of the most complex areas of business in the of Psychiatry Mark Zielinski, MD., LSU Baton Rouge Psychiatry Residency Program Supervisor FMOLHS OLOL

 

1. 1 United States.
2. Healthcare fraud is a unique crime due to the fact that the most common defendants in these cases are doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals.
3. That being said, anyone who knowingly defrauds or attempts to defraud any federal healthcare benefit program can be taken for ten years on a daily basis, I was left in what the law characterizes as a state of medical abandonment of his long-standing treatment and denied referral to every doctor or specialist of clinic affiliation.
4. 6 a malevolent cut to the throat, based on a lie, whose stab in the spine had sent me to the floor, by a physician who had not grown up with that hospital, who was not born there, in a city whose grandfather had founded and continues in the city as one of its oldest family run businesses since 1948--whose Alma Mater, I call mine (as do my parents), and whose nuns my mother sits to attend daily mass at their Chapel on the grounds of OLOL, whose Franciscan Sisters are subject to the grievous, endemic mismanagement of FMOLHS and its ordinaries of that executive board, having to defend against the likes of John Paul Funes, the Children's Hospital CEO and President of its Fundraising Department, who in 2018 was convicted of healthcare fraud, including patients.
5. What Is Healthcare Fraud? There are a number of ways to commit a fraud crime, especially healthcare fraud.
6. However, under California Penal Code 550, healthcare fraud is defined as committing, or helping someone to commit, any of these acts: Under these terms, medical professionals, employees of insurance companies, and patients can all face charges of healthcare fraud in one form or another.
7. Depending on the nature of the fraud, defendants in a healthcare fraud case may face accusations of any number of illegal acts.
8. (1) an individual or family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; (2) an individual or family with a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground; (3) an individual or family living in a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designated to provide temporary living arrangements (including hotels and motels paid for by Federal, State, or local government programs for low-income individuals or by charitable organizations, congregate shelters, and transitional housing); (4) an individual who resided in a shelter or place not meant for human habitation and who is exiting an institution where he or she temporarily resided; (5) an individual or family who— (A) will imminently lose their housing, including housing they own, rent, or live in without paying rent, are sharing with others, and rooms in hotels or motels not paid for by Federal, State, or local government programs for low-income individuals or by charitable organizations, as evidenced by— (i) a court order resulting from an eviction action that notifies the individual or family that they must leave within 14 days; (ii) the individual or family having a primary nighttime residence that is a room in a hotel or motel and where they lack the resources necessary to reside there for more than 14 days; or (iii) credible evidence indicating that the owner or renter of the housing will not allow the individual or family website multiple departments and administrators Baton Rouge and 5 hospitals in the state, resources for patient grievances and patient rights required not-for-profit tax-exempt Medicaid and ACA to stay compliant for 100denied to me,for consultation.
9. 25.impartially longstanding grievances reaffirm for consideration findings either dismissal (), 26 rescission of his licensure and ability to practice medicine governing examiners responsible state of Louisiana decision and FMOLHS refused acknowledge, nullifies their ignorance, promotes possible conspiracy, silence indicative FMOLHS through denial all claims, charges, appeals, and requests, endemic silence cowards corrupt officials need not be Mirandized to know when to keep quiet-- winning is winning at any cost 27.
10. Federal, State, Civil multiple courts, jurisdictions, agencies, committees, boards, cost lawsuits,fees, and time waiting for FMOLHS licensed practitioner association with LSU,

 

1. LSU Board of Supervisors, State, States governing bodies, dominion this for more than 14 days, and any oral statement from an individual or family seeking homeless assistance that is found to be credible shall be considered credible evidence for purposes of this clause; (B) has no subsequent residence identified; and (C) lacks the resources or support networks needed to obtain other permanent housing; and (6) unaccompanied youth and homeless families with children and youth defined as homeless under other Federal statutes who— (A) have experienced a long term period without living independently in permanent housing, (B) have experienced persistent instability as measured by frequent moves over such period, and (C) can be expected to continue in such status for an extended period of time because of chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or mental health conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence or childhood fraud and abuse, the presence of a child or youth with a disability, or multiple barriers to employment.

mark-zielinski-md-assistant-professor

Tweets by LSU_AABL