SEO

April 28, 2021

Original Title: [Iz*One disband] Changed to [Mark Zuckerberg (is attributed with the worst quote in history, I sit at drawing board and try to help) (We may not have" AND "P****") AND ("but we can" AND "long term") immediately, but we [can] ... today" Mark Zuckerberg We May Not "Have It All," But We Can Make It Better through Structural Changes]


"We

 Though well we may not pass upon his life / Without the form of justice.

may

 

not

"Have

 

the power

It All,"


to

 

create

 

the world

 

we want

 

immediately,


but

we can

all start

Make

Makking

It Better 

 



on the long term

through Structural

Changes

today.




 


"Wemay not

 

have"It All,"

all create 

poweer

have

the world


we want

but Can

through

Better Structural Changes

through

Changes

today


 start

Makking

It Better





 


  1. GOYANG, SOUTH KOREA - JUNE 24: Iz*One during MBC music program 'Show Champion' at MBC Dream Center ... June 24, 2020 in Goyang, South Korea.

  2. Last month, South Korean music-focused TV channel Mnet shared the sad news that Iz*One was set to officially disband in April,

 







  1. and it looks like there’s no going back on that announcement.

  2. The group was on something of a winning streak as of late, so it’s sad to see them go, and their breaking up could be called the first huge disbandment of the year in the industry.

  3. Iz*One 2018 reality program Produce 48.



  4. Out of nearly 100 contestants, the 12 women that ended up comprising the band were chosen, and in the last episode, their band name was revealed.

  5. By coming out on top of the series, Iz*One was given a contract that was expected to last two and a half years, with the possibility of extending after that time eclipsed.

  6. Sadly, no extension will be picked up.

  7. The especially large Iz*One launched with their EP Color*Iz








    which was fronted by the single "La Vie en Rose." Both the collection and the song were received warmly by fans all around the world, especially in South Korea, where the project went to No.

  8. 2.

  9. In the United States, the EP broke into the top 10 on the World Albums chart, while the single lifted as high as No.

  10. 6 on the World Digital Song Sales ranking.

  11. It still stands as their best-performing track.

  12. In less than three years, Iz*One went on to release two full-lengths, seven EPs and upwards of a dozen singles, when including their work as a featured act.

  13. The band, which featured 12 female performers, sang in both Korean and Japanese, and while they were more commercially successful in the former language, it was important that they recorded in both.

  14. In such a short span of time, it’s impressive that Iz*One was also able to reach the Billboard charts as often as they did.

  15. On the World Albums chart, they placed three titles, with a pair of EPs rising into the top 10.

  16. Over on the World Digital Song Sales list, at least half a dozen cuts ranked for at least for a week, with both of their first two releases stepping up into the top 10 for a period of time.

  17. It was clear from the get-go that Iz*One had something special, and fans around the world reacted positively to their incredible musical output.

  18. The group was recently caught up in scandal, as it was revealed that producers at Mnet rigged the voting to choose which contestants would end up winning.




  19. That’s a shame, as it tarnished their brand and likely spelled the end for the talented musicians and dancers in the group, who now all must find new bands, go out on their own or possibly leave performing altogether.

  20. Thankfully, as fans say goodbye to Iz*One, they will always have their music to listen to and remember the girl group that was seemingly just getting started with what could have been eventually global domination.

  21. My byline as app in The Postcard, Washable, Synthesis Reporter, MV, Sundaes waald.

  22. I love

    "We may not have the power to create the world we want immediately,

    But We Can Make It Better through Structural Changes

    We May Not "Have It All,"

    "but we can all start working on the long term today."

    Zapata CB, Santhosh L. We May Not "Have It All," But We Can Make It Better through Structural Changes. J Hosp Med. 2018 Dec;13(12):877-878. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3107. PMID: 30496331.

 

  1. i'm always high, credibly with repeat men, oratory inclination at not soon covering what's not meant to be.  See me around --glaab.

 

The posse comitatus power continues to exist in those common law states that have not expressly repealed it by statute. As an example, it is codified in Georgia under OCGA 17-4-24:

Every law enforcement officer is bound to execute the penal warrants given to him to execute. He may summon to his assistance, either in writing or orally, any of the citizens of the neighborhood or county to assist in the execution of such warrants. The acts of the citizens formed as a posse by such officer shall be subject to the same protection and consequences as official acts.

Resorting to the posse comitatus figures often in the plots of Western movies, where a body of men recruited is frequently referred to as a posse. For example, in The Magnificent Seven Ride, the protagonist recruits jailed criminals to hunt down a Mexican bandit leader. Based on this usage, the word posse has come to be used colloquially to refer to various teams, cliques, or gangs, often in pursuit of a crime suspect, sometimes without legal authority.

In a number of states, especially in the Western United States, sheriffs and other law enforcement agencies have called their civilian auxiliary groups "posses". The Lattimer Massacre of 1897 illustrated the danger of such groups, and thus ended their use in situations of civil unrest. Posse comitatus in the US became not an instrument of royal prerogative, but an institution of local self-governance. The posse functioned through, rather than upon, the local popular will.[13] From 1850 to 1878, the US Federal Government had expanded its power over individuals. This was done to safeguard national property rights for slaveholders, emancipate millions of enslaved African Americans, and enforce the doctrine of formal equality. The rise of the federal state, like the marketplace before it, had created contradictory but congruous forces of liberation and compulsion upon individuals.[14][13]

In the early decades of the United States, before slavery became a major conflict, federal use of posse comitatus in the states was rare and sporadic.[13] But the federal posse comitatus, quite literally, had compelled all of the United States to accept the legitimacy of slavery.[14] In an exhaustive study of lynching in Colorado, historian Stephen Leonard defines lynching to include the people's courts and even posses, which by definition were led by sheriffs.[13][15] Indisputably, historical records link violent lawlessness, and even lynchings, to posse comitatus.[16]

In the United States, a federal statute known as the Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878, forbade the use of the US Army, and through it, its offspring, the US Air Force, as a posse comitatus or for law enforcement purposes without the approval of Congress.[17] While the act does not explicitly mention the US Navy and the US Marine Corps, the US Department of the Navy has prescribed regulations that are generally construed to give the act force with respect to branches as well.[18]

In 2013, a directive from the US Secretary of Defense directly addresses this issue: it prohibits the use of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps for domestic law enforcement.[19]

The limitation does not apply to the National Guard of the United States when activated by a state's governor and operating in accordance with Title 32 of the US Code, such as deployments by state governors in response to Hurricane Katrina.[20]

Notable posses

Pierce County, 1856

In response to the dispatch of militia by the Governor of Washington Territory, Isaac Stevens, to arrest Francis A. Chenoweth, the chief justice of the territory's supreme court, who was holding court in the Pierce County Courthouse, the sheriff of Pierce County deputized 50 to 60 civilians for the defense of the court. The standoff between the posse and the militia was ultimately resolved by negotiations and the latter withdrew.[21]

Luzerne County, 1897

In 1897 the sheriff of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, deputized 100 civilians to supplement 50 deputy sheriffs in confronting 400 striking mine workers at the Lattimer Mines. The posse fired at the strikers leaving 19 dead.[22] This incident is referred to as the Lattimer massacre.

Hinsdale County, 1994

In 1994, after violent bank robbers fled from Mineral County, Colorado, into remote Hinsdale County, Colorado, which, at the time, had three full-time law enforcement officers for its 500 residents. The county sheriff summoned the power of the county; more than 100 deputized civilians were directed in house-to-house searches for the fugitives. The robbers were killed as the posse closed on their location.[23]

Legal status

Case law

Following the Baltimore riot of 1968, 1,500 lawsuits were filed against the city of Baltimore seeking compensation for damages sustained due to the failure of the police to suppress the unrest. The city sought declaratory judgment arguing that it could not be liable for any failures of the Baltimore municipal police, as it was an agency of the State of Maryland and the city had no law enforcement authority. In rejecting the argument, the Maryland Court of Appeals observed that Baltimore, as an independent city and—therefore—a county equivalent, was still in possession of the ability to summon the power of the county as that right had not explicitly been repealed by statute and, therefore, remained part of the common law.[24] The court noted:

We are therefore of the opinion that the powers associated with that of a conservator of the peace and the power to form a "posse comitatus," which is included in the powers of a conservator of the peace, were powers available for employment by the City, through the Mayor, should the exercise of reasonable diligence have dictated that they be used.

Statute law

State provisions

Writing in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, David Kopel observed that almost all US states provide statutory authority for sheriffs, or other local officials, to summon the power of the county. In many cases, civil and criminal penalties are prescribed for members of the public who shirk posse duty when summoned; South Carolina provides that "any person refusing to assist as one of the posse ... shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction shall be fined not less than thirty nor more than one hundred dollars or imprisoned for thirty days" while in New Hampshire a fine of "not more than $20" has been set.[23]

Federal provisions

Title 42, section 1989, of the United States Code extends the authority to summon the power of the county to United States magistrate judges when necessary to enforce their orders:

... persons so appointed shall have authority to summon and call to their aid the bystanders or posse comitatus of the proper county, or such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of the duty with which they are charged ...

See also

References


  1. "City of Baltimore v. Silver, 283 A.2d 788 (Md. 1972)". courtlistener.com. Court Listener. Retrieved July 19, 2018.

External links

  • "Ruby, Arizona – A Ghost Town Filled With Mining and Murder". Legends of America. p. 3. Archived from the original on 2011-08-23. Retrieved 2011-08-02.

  • OED, s.v. "posse n. 2, posse comitatus.


  • "All the Posse of Hell, cannot violently eject me." T. Fuller, Good Thoughts in Bad Times (1645) I. xv. 39. "A whole posse of the young lady's kindred – brothers, cousins and uncles – stood ready at the street door to usher me upstairs." W. Beckford Portuguese Jrnl. 10 June 1787, p. 72. (cited after OED).


  • "I can lick the whole posser-commertatus of yer. Come on, yer cowards!" Harper's Magazine July 1862, 184/1 (cited after OED).


  • Mueller, Hans-Friedrich. (2013). “Latin 101.” The Teaching Company.


  • "Dickinson College Commentaries". Allen and Greenough's Latin Grammar. Irregular Verbs: Compounds of Sum. Footnotes: Other early forms.


  • Louis, Ha. "Irregular Conjugated Verb". Chinese University of Hong Kong.


  • Adams, George (1914). "Select Documents of English Constitutional History". The Macmillan Company.


  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Atkinson, Charles Francis (1911). "Great Rebellion". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 12 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 408.


  • Schedule 3, Part III, Criminal Law Act 1967


  • section 8, Sheriffs Act 1887 (as passed)


  • section 8, Sheriffs Act 1887 (as amended)


  • Kopel, David B. "The Posse Comitatus And The Office Of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned To The Aid Of Law Enforcement". Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 104, Issue 4; Symposium On Guns In America.


  • Gautham, Rao (2005). "The Federal Posse Comitatus Doctrine: Slavery, Compulsion, and Statecraft in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America". Law and History Review, Volume 26, Issue 1; Spring 2005, pp. 1–56.


  • “Lynching in Colorado, 1859–1919” (University Press Colorado, 2002).


  • "Hate Normalized: Posse Comitatus?".


  • 18 U.S.C. § 1385


  • 32 C.F.R. § 213.2 (although the Navy and Marine Corps are not included in the Posse Comitatus Act, they were made subject to it by DoD Regulation)


  • "Department of Defense Directive 5525.5". The Posse Comitatus Act.



  • Floyd, Kaylor (1917). Washington, West of the Cascades: Historical and Descriptive; the Explorers, the Indians, the Pioneers, the Modern, Volume 1. S. J. Clarke Publishing Company. pp. 164–166.


  • Miller, Wilbur R. (2012). The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: An Encyclopedia. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1483305936.


  • Kopel, David (Fall 2015). "The Posse Comitatus And The Office Of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned To The Aid Of Law Enforcement". The Posse Comitatus and the Office of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned to the Aid of Law Enforcement. 104 (4).



    • at