Confirm Subscription
You are about to subscribe to limbsandthings1's channel, which will add limbsandthings1's latest videos to your subscriptions page.
Latest videos from limbsandthings1
1:35
0:35
4:09
6:53
2:57
0:35
http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=limbsandthings1
Post via Dogmeat
“The apes have taken over — while we were busy watching television and filling our freezers, they’ve come out of the jungle and moved in!”
Workout With Lee Marvin's excellent neo-noir thriller, "Shack Out on 101" (Title was supposed to be "Shack Up on 101"), a 1955 cold war gem starring Frank Lovejoy, Keenan Wynn, Terry Moore (she objected to Lee Marvin's outrageous method-acting licks from another planet...READ MORE HERE: http://post.ly/eSpG Best of Lee Marvin Shack Out On 101:
A waitress (Terry Moore) at an isolated seaside café discovers that her physicist boyfriend (Frank Lovejoy) and the café’s violent cook, “Slob” (Lee Marvin), are smuggling nuclear secrets out of the country.Genres: Review:
Despite its low budget and limited locales, this character-driven drama remains an effectively suspenseful thriller about Cold War paranoia and patriotism. The film possesses a fair amount of levity (especially in the scene where Wynn and Marvin are lifting weights), and plenty of reliably zingy dialogue: “Slob’s got an eight-cylinder body and a two-cylinder mind!” Plus, the acting by everyone involved is well above average for a B-movie, and there are enough plot twists to keep you on the edge of your seat. This surprisingly effective cult thriller deserves a release on DVD.Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
- Lee Marvin in an early yet typically hard-hitting role
- Keenan Wynn as the hard-working owner of the “shack”
- Marvin and Wynn comparing “pecs” and other body parts — a hilarious commentary on 1950s machismo
- Terry Moore as the sexy yet feisty waitress who refuses to stand by and let her beloved country be compromised
- Moore and Lovejoy interspersing kisses with questions about the U.S. Constitution
- Amusingly sincere pro-America dialogue: “What form of government is this?” “The best!”
Must See?
Yes. This cult film is well worth seeking out.Categories
Ultimately not a must.
Here’s a rare case in which I hadn’t read the assessment before revisiting the film (after many, many years). The film’s ‘redeeming qualities and moments’ do almost make it worth a watch and the premise is a good one. But the script is too often lazy and way too loony - by that I mean it spends too much time bordering on indecipherable; the longer the film went on, the less I personally cared about the outcome.
The first half is better; its dialogue is more insane (and, yes, the workout scene is a standout - actually, the actors seems to be having more of a field day early on). But you usually have the feeling of eavesdropping, and you find yourself thinking ‘Huh?’…’Huh?’ at just about every turn - as though you walked in late, even though you’ve been watching from the beginning.
Three things in particular kind of bug me:
a) Why does the plot have to be bogged down with so much time spent on which of three guys is Moore going to end up with romantically?
b) The scene in which Moore ridiculously blasts the jukebox - supposedly to ‘fool’ Marvin, who is just in the next room and who could only get the idea that Moore is up to something.
c) The unnaturally drawn-out scene near the end, in which several of the characters try to keep Marvin talking so that someone can come to their rescue.I do like the snazz-jazz over the credits.
Lady
You ! Lady-comment.
Post via Dogmeat
Post via Dogmeat
Post via Dogmeat
Post via Dogmeat
