Summer is hot more than usual, not only in the climate, as we breathe an air more than hot running between the pleats of a justice that never ceases to surprise us, until who knows when and where, will also day of clarity ...
We must believe, we must not give up, do a favor to those who "play" with the lives of others, the many dead who killed unknowingly forage mysterious interests even within the same institutions.
Victims, who become matters of contention between international powers, where in the end, the recovery of the truth seems to get confused among the many, too many plots that feed dialogues between deaf interlocutors collude and camouflaged within a system failure, rotted over time, a system that continues to stretch its tentacles by a court to another, giving a picture of himself like a big underground laboratory where the alchemists of Justice chose to clone the animals in the infinite non-truth, as long as similar to the most convenient truths .
And is the natural consequence of this system, the reaction of those who take advantage of events to launch attacks and then now this now than to manipulate a particular circumstance to their own use and consumption, especially when the game is in prison for life .
These days, during which Amanda Knox has submitted questions, accused of killing Meredith Kercher, all America fell in the area, the highest level of mass media, opinion leaders, representatives of institutions in the USA, all the American people have made Amanda an innocent victim, a victim of the Italian judicial system.
Has fallen even in the comic, when some American university, interviewed, they said not to understand how it can be possible in Italy that a person is in prison against their will!
Who knows, maybe one day discover that there are prisoners with volunteers ... and the crisis that exists, it is possible that many use to be maintained by the State, albeit in a cell.
Free room and board, no bills, medical care, psychologist, social life, interviews with family members, all day in the company of those who share the same requirement, bè ... to close ...
The government is careful, because maintaining a prisoner costs several hundred euros a day ...!
On the other hand, before demonizing the behavior of Americans, it is also fair, in this specific case, try to understand the origins, the reason for this unanimous chorus of harsh reactions that since the first time have pointed the finger at the Pm Mignini, even forgetting that he sent to bar Amanda and her alleged accomplices, was the Judge Paolo Micheli, whom did not have neither the Americans nor the defenders of the accused.
Mignini has been accused of everything, there is a character banner to say without any fear of any consequences.
Articles by Tone defamatory, libelous, and aggravated by a totally false assumption that has repeatedly called into question myself, as if I had even influenced the Pm when the plant accusatorial a load of lovely Amanda.
At first I resisted, then two days ago I have not done more, and also in my video of the June 13 (http://ilmostroafirenze.in) I wanted to clarify my position.
And not only about the absolute differences of belief or opinion between me and the public prosecutor of Perugia where Meredith Kercher, but I felt it right to tell me that this judge even placed under house arrest, which stemmed from the fact of the processes in my load , and in the course of which are keen to bring out the truth that so many even today no one imagines.
Personally I think he has suffered serious injustice, and subirle not yet reached the time when, before a Judge, pull out the cards, records, and anything else I think that triggers a putiferio at the top of the state.
From 1995 to today, and will continue albeit at different tables, I think I made a huge contribution to both surveys showed that, in the death of Narducci, and there were times when I dedicated the front pages of newspapers, or I was the guest of honor in dozens of television lounges
Today I have many items for a bitter and reasonable doubt: it was only used.
In investigations of Florence and Perugia, success is everything, and I repeat, whether in storage in case of trial, I refer to the process Narducci, the institutions involved will have to retrace the course of years and years of investigations and understand what mechanisms in turn are activated and especially for what purposes.
However, I personally do not agree with the behavior of Americans who are waiting like manna from heaven for a conviction or Mignini Giuttari, as though the event that circumstances do not result in the acquittal for Amanda.
And I think that especially for Mignini, being now seated in the dock, has invariably marked his life, beyond a final verdict, but this tragedy has hit him on his family, and perhaps on same confidence in the justice court.
Unless he does not recognize to be guilty, it is presumed that like myself and many other defendants feel the victim of a grave injustice.
It may well therefore include those of an injustice you feel when the victim receives the effect of his measure.
My vision of things is also a po 'original in the sense that when we learned that the prosecutor of Florence decided to process the Pm Mignini not looked at the facts for which he was indicted, but my first thought went fulminate to the Lord, then the day that I saw come to my house the judicial police of Pm, and after an hour we talked to believe that they had come once again to obtain what was useful to the investigation, I heard saying: "Madam, we regret infinitely, but must also understand Dr. Mignini, due to act, we must notify a measure of house arrest "...
It was a succession of acts which I repeat again today, demanding the surrender of the total truth, when I fight back by producing what it will require the Government, the Ministers, the CSM, all the vertices of the institutions to require many explanations.
Of course, the day that the history of many years will be clarified, the profile of all those who for various reasons have been part will be defined and then we can venture the opinion about a person, but until that time we will satisfy of observations, inferences, considerations, which have their own weight.
And among the many comments that I received via email, there is one that would see as "incompatible" defense on the part of Giuttari Fioravanti, substitute of Giovanni Maria Dedola.
It must be said that with regard to incompatibility of the defender who is also a witness, the opinions are not still agree, however it is undeniable that the lawyer has even Fioravanti deposed as a witness in the course of the evidence in the death of Narducci .
In fact, result in documents that the lawyer was repeatedly interrogated by Giuttari and then called to confirm his testimony even before the Pm Mignini.
Now, one might note that the facts on which the lawyer defending the police are made other than those for which Fioravanti is a witness.
Formally, the observation appears just, even if in principle one could say that ultimately it comes to facts within the same story.
Or you could also say that the investigators for the crimes of the monster saw two levels, a laborer and a so-called "greater", as saying: Pacciani the unskilled, the principal ... Narducci both dead, both non-processed, both "innocent" to vitam post mortem, because you can not prove otherwise.
But going to read the documents, show the possibility that as reported Pacciani was alive to his lawyer, the doctor, presumably Narducci, he also had a role of "executor", at least in some of the double crime, and investigators this role would have been in competition with others as a pharmacist & company ...
And it was also apparent from the documents, according to some, that the investigations were stopped or held back by institutional actors.
Same thing seems to have provoked, it seems, the trial of Giuttari and Mignini, on the basis of a registration in which it appears that a deputy prosecutor of Florence, citing the chief prosecutor, has said. ".. It is not a free man ..." during a conversation on surveys Monster, even on higher levels of the Monster.
Little or no public opinion has realized that this story, and he understands more and less.
For example, Giuttari has always maintained that the registration occurred randomly without him they were aware.
It may be, and believe, but then the question arises: why did they use legal?
Will have had its reasons, but certainly, to us poor mortals, if we were better, perhaps it would help ....
However admirable the peace had been restored between the policeman el'avvocato historic Pacciani, bitter enemies in the past, until 2004, as you note yourself by going to my site www.ilmostroafirenze.in, if you have the patience to listen to broadcasts officers that I put on the network.
You will find that a Porta a Porta, September 26 2001, Fioravanti Giuttari and clashed hard facts and procedural, not on opinions.
Not to mention the cause of death of Pacciani.
After hearing what states with absolute safety in 2002 Fioravanti, Tg2 Dossier Special, and then in Costanzo Show, 12 January 2004. (www.ilmostroafirenze.in)
These are circumstances which, if allowed to spread over time and thus are lost in the memory of the community, may pass unnoticed, but if it becomes a voluminous document files, then repeat to us citizens, and someone will respond.
Given the cost of forty years of investigation ....
What the law for some time, notice that Gabriella Carlizzi in his articles on the offensive to most anyone, the painful experiences we need to change in form, even if within us the essence of authenticity remains unchanged.
But our values, when in danger of becoming straccetti disposable, have a duty to protect them and put them in with the right people at the right time.
What is now pointing the finger at this or against that, in the case of Amanda?
May have the opposite effect, human nature keeps its fragility under any garment, and therefore would be at least cautious not to offend the Italian justice so blatant, and could be useful to try to better understand the development of collateral events, and be a 'more precise idea on certain subjects or circumstances, who can prove through documents in hand, the absurdity of a certain act.
Deposition of Amanda, as personal opinion, many statements do not hold, does not seem sincere.
In the house, in my opinion there was Amanda, was found to live in spite of himself the drama of a crime, and has taken refuge in the arms of Raphael, as a first instinctive reaction, perhaps waiting to get advice from Mom.
But on balance, although he claimed to be but that they had not killed the poor Meredith, a position similar to that of Rudy, his thirty years in prison would have been granted, no one would have believed.
Hence, the only card in play, is to emphasize the total absence from the house of the crime, his and Raphael, but that argument, yes, makes water from all sides.
How do I bring up the student Amanda as soap and water, and then pretend that you believe that the same, comes home and sees blood, there is even a shower, and then back from boyfriend?
And it takes heart from a killer for comportasi so, another student that water and soap ...
Amanda the innocent, sensitive, once entry into the house and saw the blood, would have called his Raffaele, the police would have made sure to open the door to Meredith, then other good instincts would have known.
Unfortunately, here it is to be expected at least a conviction at first instance, then, as always happens in similar cases, in a few years Amanda will know that the true murderess is another, not just tell you the name, so that if l 'murderess is the powerful will leave the prison, then start the usual game we have seen with balance and with Pelosi, for example.
The real victims after Meredith, once again we are, we suspect that the killer is at large, and perhaps let us not fail to understand.
Suffice it to say that the house of the crime, although in isolation, have entered more than once unknown, and take things away, too bulky, have not shown any hurry ...
Also protected them?
Of course Amanda, Raffaele and Rudy, are not released from jail to go there ...
So who was this interest, to the point of risking so much, or as to not risk anything?
Hot Questions?
We talk about hot summer ...