Dear Yugoslavians,
The question is to find when ( which year ) that particular "summer" took place.
1_ "Oh when ? About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was
that summer."
2_ "I was born in 1910, in Paris".
3_ " But the mimosa [ the mimosa of that particular summer ] grove ...
until at last 24 years later, I broke her [Annabel's] spell by
incarnating her in another [Lolita]."
4_ "Now, at 12, she [Lolita] was a regular pest."
All the information in brackets is just meant to clarify the riddle for someone
who wouldn't know anything about the novel. No extra information should be
peeked from the book in order to find the answer. A corollary question
could be to find out in which year Lolita was born, and in which year
Humbert Humbert met Lolita for the first time. The correct answer should not
only give these dates but also prove that it's the unique possible answer.
So, can you break the riddle ?
October 20, 2009
Dear Yugoslavians, NABISCO-Archives -- March 1996 (#35)
Getting chased by farmers and dogs. I wish we got shot with rock salt shotgun cartridges, I hear that's fun also.
Getting chased by farmers and dogs. I wish we got shot with rock salt shotgun cartridges, I hear that's fun also.
CAMERON SMITH
Sybil-sift all “Official truelove with outtakes” plus 2 more
Posted: 16 May 2012 01:52 AM PDT
Official truelove with outtakes
by Maury O'Rourk
Drink,
it must be the nature of the ravens, more storms
but,
softhearted, erotic.
Official truelove with outtakes.
Bishop White gamblers horse herding,
the softhearted person shall possess the secret of the family, fishermen, and others are in force.
Disuse me.
Carouse
migrate
or irrational paganism of drinkable food tantrums.
He put the fever of the forepaws
SALAD fetish-beast sat on me.
Change,
and making merry Urbicus KOSHER maid you.
The Puer.
Mr. Storm was born German writer of voodoo -
of many kinds,
from the estates of Indians of the Electric Circus.
Nosferatu Vertiginous love with all the SOB.
I believe you have suffered.
I am the greatest gifts before quavery sunbathing on hands-off, hand-drawn charm or pleasant Hydrotherapy little impudence,
sincerely,
in recognition of the balls.
My executors to prevent overcomplicated Defätisten favor of the integument.
Now, wormwood,
or Headstand is in order,
in the Sybil-sift all,
or mild.
And what I say.
I am ashamed, close.
 |
|
Posted: 16 May 2012 01:33 AM PDT
|
|
Posted: 16 May 2012 01:29 AM PDT
via youtube.com
Cleo Patricx, Prinsex of Chicago, erotic film star during his
1986 opening show for Billy Cox, with his Mae West hat. Androgynous
shades of sensuality hover over the audience. Panties are tossed to the
stage with an aroma of pot and panty perfume persona, which is an
automatic freak boner.
|
We're here to find out if premature ejaculation is an issue
We're here to find out
if premature ejaculation is an issue.
Why does it happen,
do men find it embarrassing
and what do their partners think?
How would you feel
if someone ejaculated prematurely?
I would feel understanding of it.
I know it's a common problem.
As long as the quality's good,
I wouldn't be disappointed.
- Has it ever happened to you?
- I've been too keen a few times.
It's a bit taboo still, I'd say.
Why are men embarrassed
about premature ejaculation?
You don't need to talk
about any past experiences.
What actually is premature ejaculation?
Well, let's start with ejaculation.
Technically that's
the squirting of semen from the penis
during orgasm, sexual climax.
In everyday language
it's when a guy comes.
So premature ejaculation
is when a guy comes too quickly.
Premature ejaculation,
is that just very quickly or before?
How do classify what premature is?
For every guy, how long it takes
to climax is different.
If it was five minutes
I think that's quite good.
A guy may have entered his partner,
he may be getting ready to enter
or he may not have even
got his clothes off before he climaxes.
If it goes on past 10, 15 minutes
it drags on a bit.
Why do you think it matters...
But if it's really good,
time isn't really a matter.
It's only if that's a problem for him
that he needs to seek some help.
- What do you think causes it sometimes?
- Too excited.
Pressure, trying too hard.
You're there before the race is over.
Just getting a bit excited, overexcited.
You're just in the moment, you just want
to get straight to that point.
What are the causes?
Well, for the most part
it's a psychological problem.
But it's a very common problem. Most men
will suffer this from time to time.
If it's happened to a man once
and worried them, it could get worse?
If it happens once and a guy
gets into this downward spiral,
"It'll happen again,"
and it does happen again,
then yes, it's likely to get worse.
It's not something they're in control
of, so I guess they should seek help.
Maybe... Is it like an illness?
If there's an underlying medical problem
that's responsible,
diabetes, hypertension,
it might be because he's drinking
too much, using recreational drugs,
or it might be because he's stressed.
If it's down to lifestyle,
cut down the alcohol
and don't use recreational drugs.
If it's down to anxiety
and problems within the relationship,
couples counselling
might be a good idea.
It is something that I know
is embarrassing for men
and it is seen as a problem
because obviously
then sex doesn't last as long
and they feel
they haven't satisfied the woman.
Why do you think you'd be embarrassed?
Because nothing's happened yet
and it's all over before it's started,
so it would be embarrassing.
Would you be embarrassed
to admit it had?
I wouldn't be... I mean,
if it's happening now I would be.
It's not something they'd discuss
with their friends.
You wouldn't discuss that
with your male friends.
This is something men find embarrassing
and that makes matters worse.
It affects all men
at some stage in their lives,
and if it gets to be a problem
a guy shouldn't be embarrassed
about asking for help.
The GP isn't going to be embarrassed.
I wouldn't berate them for it
or anything.
It's obviously an issue that they
probably feel quite bad about anyway.
I feel quite complimented
because I'm that hot.
When things are new
you get a bit excited.
Just chill out a bit.
If you are going to do it
in the first five seconds,
just make sure you build up again.
Just have a go with themselves
before they go out.
- That's a trick.
- That's a bit of a trick, yes.
It might make them stay a bit longer.
Do you know of any tricks men can do
to stop getting so excited?
All the TV programmes say you should
think of really dull subjects.
For anybody watching this
who's worried about it
and thinking it may be a problem,
what can they do?
If you worry about it
it's likely to get worse.
There are some self-help tips.
If you're using condoms,
try and use a thicker condom
because that will decrease the sensation
and make things last longer.
The squeeze technique,
where a partner is masturbating the guy
to the point where he indicates
that he's about to climax.
He or she then squeezes the head
of the penis for 10 to 20 seconds
and then resumes masturbation
about 30 seconds later.
Essentially that calms down
the ejaculation reflex.
Sometimes all it needs
is to be told that everything's normal
and how to deal with it.
I wouldn't be too bothered. It would be
something to work out as a couple.
- Has it ever happened to you?
- It might have done.
(laughing)
Yes.
It's not anything you can't get over in
20 minutes, when you've both recovered.
You just get up and do it again,
don't you? It's not an issue.
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Swiss criminal court to Polanski: No dice
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Swiss criminal court to Polanski: No diceSwiss criminal court to Polanski: No dice
posted at 1:36 pm on October 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendlyThe odds of the successful extradition of Roman Polanski from Switzerland to the US increased today with a ruling by the top Swiss criminal court that denied Polanski’s bail request. Polanski’s attorneys attempted to wheedle the judges with offers of electronic surveillance and the collateral of a chalet in Gstaad as guarantees of Polanski’s good behavior through the extradition process. However, the court took the entirely reasonable approach that a man who went on the lam for over 30 years probably wouldn’t keep his promises to stick around this time, either:
Roman Polanski’s three decades as a fugitive are coming back to haunt him.
Noting his previous escape from U.S. authorities, Switzerland’s top criminal court on Tuesday rejected Polanski’s appeal to be released from prison because of the “high” risk that the 76-year-old director would try to flee again.
Polanski’s offers of bail, house arrest and electronic monitoring failed to sway the tribunal. Even a Swiss chalet in the luxury resort of Gstaad was brushed aside as insufficient collateral to guard against Polanski fleeing the country, as the United States seeks to have him extradited for having sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1977.
“The appellant has already once in 1978 eluded American criminal proceedings by traveling to Europe,” the Federal Criminal Court said in its 17-page verdict, adding that Polanski’s transfer to the U.S. could also cause family trauma and cost investors millions of dollars in losses.
“As a result, the motivation to flee is high,” it said.
No kidding!
One point in the article raised my hackles a bit. Polanski’s attorney said that continued incarceration would cripple the effort to finish his latest film, causing Polanski to go bankrupt and investors to lose $40 million. That cut no ice with the court — and rightfully so. The people who backed a fugitive running away from a statutory-rape conviction should have thought twice before investing that kind of cash, regardless of who they are or what kind of director Polanski is. They took the risk that Polanski would continue to avoid arrest and extradition, gambling that his name would produce a profit on their investment. They chose …. poorly.
Interestingly, the US has not yet submitted a formal extradition request to Switzerland after Polanski’s arrest. The Obama administration has until November 25th to do so, or the Swiss will be forced to release Polanski. Over the next five weeks, we will see if the White House is more interested in appeasing its Hollywood backers or enforcing the law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)