Damaged reputations | Media | MediaGuardianDamaged reputations
Vanity Fair's editor has done his readers a disservice by writing an article that attempts to gloss over Roman Polanski's libel victory against the magazine, says Roy Greenslade
- MediaGuardian, Tuesday 13 September 2005 15.18 BST
- Article history
I have long admired Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair. He produces a polished, readable magazine that pulls off the neat trick of lending credibility to an array of celebrity trivia while covering a range of serious topics in an accessible, yet intelligent, fashion.
Low-brow meets high-brow in a glossy cultural concoction that contrives to say a great deal about modern America.
And not only the United States. Mr Carter appears both to understand, and have an affection for, Britain. He indulges the Brit polemicist Christopher Hitchens and among his contributing editors are Andrew Neil, AA Gill, Victoria Mather, Janine di Giovanni and Rupert Everett.
The latest issue (October 2005) includes a lengthy and detailed analysis of Britain's newspaper format revolution, heaping praise on the Guardian and its editor.
But that issue, now on sale in Britain, also carries a piece under Mr Carter's own byline about a British court case and its aftermath that is so economical with the truth and so lacking in fairness, that it could well undermine his, and his magazine's, reputation.
Mr Carter is upset that he lost a libel action against Vanity Fair brought in Britain by Roman Polanski, the film director, who lives in France and who gave evidence to the high court by video link because, if he had set foot in London, he would face extradition to the US for having sex with a girl of 13 in 1977.
The libel case hinged on an incident that occurred even further back, in 1969, soon after the murder of Polanski's wife, Sharon Tate.
According to a Vanity Fair article, published in July 2002, Polanski was in the famous New York restaurant, Elaine's, when he made sexual advances to a woman said to resemble Tate. He is alleged to have touched her knee and said he would make her "another Sharon Tate".
Vanity Fair depended for its allegations on the evidence of Lewis Lapham, the editor of Harper's magazine, and his friend, Edward Perlberg, a former Wall Street executive.
Lapham claimed to have seen Polanski make the pass at a "Swedish model", who was with Perlberg. Polanski told the court he couldn't remember anything remotely like that having occurred, and was supported by Mia Farrow, who was with him at Elaine's, and who stated in court that it definitely did not happen.
The jury found for Polanski, awarding him £50,000 in damages, and a bill for costs likely to reach £1m. Immediately after the trial Mr Carter cast himself as a wronged man, pointing out that it was astonishing that the court had allowed Polanski to give evidence by video.
One glaringly obvious omission from the trial was the "Swedish model" at the centre of the allegation, Beate Telle. Though supposedly asked to give evidence, she did not do so. But a couple of days after the trial's conclusion the Mail on Sunday tracked her down.
It transpired that she was, in fact, Norwegian. She told the paper that she well remembered seeing Polanski that evening, though she didn't know who he was until told later by Perlberg.
She said that Polanski approached the table where she was sitting but did not speak to her and certainly didn't touch her. "He just stared at me for ages," she said. "Perhaps I reminded him of Sharon Tate."
Though Telle's statement was made in a newspaper interview rather than in court, it is surely germane to how we view the case. She was unequivocally denying that Polanski had been guilty of any bad behaviour towards her and therefore. if what she said was correct, destroyed the credibility of Vanity Fair's sordid tittle-tattle.
So, in the editor's article about the case, I expected him to make some reference to Telle's recollection of events, even if to pose relevant questions about why she had apparently rejected the chance to give evidence. Instead, he never mentioned her name.
He devoted his piece to a gentle debunking of Britain's libel law, for which I have some sympathy, taking cliched side-wipes at the differences between court-room conduct and the jury selection process in Britain and the US.
There are also amusing diversions, such as a pen-portrait of his encounter with the woman who runs the pub behind the high court.
But the insistent message of Mr Carter's article is that Polanski is a villain and the magazine was justified in its allegation.
He neatly skips over his magazine's mistakes, seemingly concealing the fact that it got Telle's nationality wrong by referring to her as a Scandinavian model and arguing that another error - the date of the Elaine's incident was out by two weeks - was of no consequence.
He makes no reference to Telle's denial, thereby robbing Vanity Fair readers of the chance to make up their own minds about the case and blandly concludes: "I was stirred but not shaken by the verdict."
Well, if he wasn't, he should have been. Just because Polanski has a bad reputation, it doesn't mean that journalists should publish false stories about him.
The episode does no credit to Mr Carter or his magazine. Telle's version of events is hugely significant. By failing to mention it, Mr Carter compounds his magazine's previous errors.
If he goes on keeping his readers in the dark he will surely earn his magazine a new nickname: Vanity Unfair.
September 28, 2009
Damaged reputations | Media | MediaGuardian
Best Article on the Samantha 'Gailey' Date Yet, But it sounds like my first date with my last girlfriend - except for #4 and 1b - Roman Polanski and that night in 1977: a reminder | Film | The Guardian
Roman Polanski and that night in 1977: a reminder | Film | The Guardian1. Polanski, then 44, was taking photos of 13-year-old Samantha Gailey for a magazine.
2. He took her back to Jack Nicholson's house and gave her champagne and, according to her, the recreational drug Quaaludes.
3. He then, it's been alleged, sodomised her.
4. He pleaded guilty to sex with a minor, served 42 days, and then fled the country before the final sentencing.
5. The end.
Roman Polanski | ski (that's just what i call him) | guardian.co.uk
Roman Polanski | Film | guardian.co.ukski (that's just what i call him)
27 Sep 2009: Peter Bradshaw on the Oscar-winning director of The Pianist, arrested in Switzerland on a warrant relating to the rape of a 13-year-old girl in 197727 Sep 2009: Film director held over outstanding 1978 US arrest warrant after travelling to collect award at Zurich film festival
Former Manson accomplice Linda Kasabian tells full story of bloody night which ended decade of love
When a horror movie goes wrong, audiences respond with laughter. When a horror-comedy goes wrong, the results are just painful
Two new actors signed up for The Ghost as legal proceedings temporarily halted
Muse of Yves Saint Laurent and former wife of David Bailey ... Laura Barton tries to keep up with Catherine Deneuve
Samantha Geimer pleads for a speedy end to 'lurid' claims made in the course of the case
Profile: After decades in exile, there are indications that Roman Polanski may soon be free to return to the US
Lawyers file request in LA on basis of evidence in a recent documentary Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
A recent documentary claims charges of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor should be overturned. Hadley Freeman looks back
September 27, 2009
AMW.com | Tobechi Onwuhara - Fugitive
AMW.com | Tobechi Onwuhara - Fugitive
AMW FUGITIVE DATA FILE FOR
The FBI is gunning for Tobe Onwuhara, who they say bilked banks out of at least $44 million.
The FBI says it is investigating a group of Nigerians who are accused of using online internet databases to steal victims' identities to the tune of $44 million.
Authorities say they are currently focusing all of their manpower on the group's top dog -- Tobechi "Tobe" Onwuhara.
Agents say Onwuhara is the mastermind behind the scheme, and they say they won't stop tracking him until he is in handcuffs.
According to the FBI, Onwuhara and his accomplices were somehow able to gain access to victims’ personal information through a database -- specifically the victims' Home Equity Line of Credit accounts. Once inside, they were able to wire the money to accounts mainly located overseas, but some inside the U.S.
Authorities say the group has been operating for approximately three years, and they're accused of causing tens of millions in losses to banks and homeowners.
Agents say Onwuhara is a very smart and crafty man whose only skill was defrauding people.An Accused Con Man's Checkered Past
The FBI says Tobechi Onwuhara is part of a group of Nigerians who they say are using online internet databases to steal victims' identities to the tune of $44 million.According to the FBI, Onwuhara is a Nigerian who they believe entered the U.S. some time in 1999 or 2000, on a student visa.
Cops say Onwuhara had high aspirations for himself, but his thirst for knowledge extended beyond the university's halls of learning -- and they didn't involve getting a degree from a prestigious school.
Cops say Onwuhara's schemes came from hard work and garnered him millions of dollars. Investigators say he literally researched and tested his schemes until he was successful.
Agents say Onwuhara is a very smart and crafty man whose only skill was defrauding people -- something police say Onwuhara has been doing for years.
The Life of A PlayboyInvestigators say Onwuhara moved around, from Seattle, Wash., where he lived for a short time, and Houston, Texas.
Officials say Onwuhara finally settled on two places -- Miami and Dallas -- were he divided his time. In Miami, Onwuhara kicked back in his $600,000 home, while cops say Dallas was a playland where he lived the life of a multi-millionaire playboy and businessman, renting a condo for $4,000 a month.
While agents describe Onwuhara as a quiet guy, they say he craved the spotlight and let his money do his talking for him.
Investigators say Onwuhara loved "making it rain" -- throwing fistfuls of cash up in the air -- in one of his favorite spots, a local strip club. There, he and associates would not only make it rain, according to agents, they made it thunderstorm.
On a thunderstorm night, Onwuhara could easily drop $50,000, cops say.
Agents say his desires didn't stop with cash and women. Investigators say Onwuhara loved luxury automobiles -- a Maserati, a Bentley, a Rolls-Royce Phantom -- and worked as a car salesman to indulge his passion.
Once in his possession, agents say Onwuhara would ship the cars to Nigeria to be sold.
According to agents, Onwuhara was so confident in his skills and scams that he never believed they could be traced directly back to him. Investigators say the only paper trail Onwuhara left behind lead directly back to close associates -- or so he thought. While Onwuhara thought he was smart, agents say they were smarter, and were able to unravel his alleged scams in precise detail.
With the money he generated from his illegal activities, they say Onwuhara started his own hip-hop label, called S.W.A.T. Up Entertainment. He even signed two artists to the label, and cops say Onwuhara owned a recording studio at one point.
But cops say Onwuhara's foray into the record business was just a dalliance. He made his real money through his many scams -- ultimately scamming banks out of $44 million.
Investigators are now hunting Onwuhara and say he could be hiding out in Dallas, Miami, Atlanta, New Jersey, or Canada.
If you have information on the whereabouts of Tobechi "Tobe" Onwuhara, call our hotline at 1-800-CRIME-TV.
-- by Denni Michael Wagner, AMW Staff
