- What Is TextSendr?
TextSendr is free text messaging. Whether you're tired of paying to send text messages, or simply hate typing on that tiny phone keypad TextSendr is your solution. Quite simply, TextSendr allows you to send a free text message from your computer to most cell phones. - Is it Really Free?
Yes! We do not charge senders or recipients for any messages. All text messages sent on TextSendr are treated as if they came from a cell phone - so that means the recipient must have text messages in their plan and not be over their limit. - What's That "Trnsl8" Button Do?
The Trnsl8 button is a feature that only Textsendr can offer. We know that it can be hard to fit everything you want into a text message, so we've partnered with NoSlang.com - the web's best internet slang dictionary - to offer a translation service for our users. The Trnsl8 button makes it easy for you to shorten your messages or just learn some new slang. - Can I Trust You With My Email or Phone Number?
Yes you can! We won't sell or share any of your information. In fact, we don't store any emails, text messages, or phone numbers entered into our system - so we couldn't even if we wanted to. In addition, you'll never receive a text message from the site that wasn't sent by a user. - Who Sent My Message?
Users of TextSendr aren't required to register to use our service, and we don't keep logs of messages - so unless they included their name or email address, we really have no idea who sent your message. - How Can I Stop Getting Messages?
If you're getting messages from TextSendr, it means that somebody who already knows your number sent it. If you're getting nasty or unwanted messages, they're probably coming from somebody you know. Your best bet is to change your cell phone number or be more careful with who you give it to. - What if I Send Death Threats Or Spam?
Theoretically, there's nothing stopping you from doing so - other than the fact that it's illegal and eventually the person is going to figure out who's doing it. It's probably best to re-think that idea instead. We at TextSendr are strong believers in Karma, and sending nasty messages is a great way to ruin yours. With that said, we will proactively block and take measures against anybody using our system to send spam. That includes attempts to automate TextSendr into other applications. Just Play Nice!
@mrjyn
July 26, 2009
i just added TextSendr to the top right of my page. it's free texting and anonymous, so include your info if you want a response. try it.
Jackson Case Highlights Medical Ethics
Jackson Case Highlights Medical Ethics
Two prominent doctors in the field of pain management reflect on the malign influence of celebrity.
From 2001 to 2005, unintentional overdose deaths due to prescription drugs increased 114 percent.Ieva Geneviciene
The King of Pop and the World's Greatest Womanizer have more in common than you might think.
Michael Jackson's death last month, like that of Howard Hughes in 1976, revealed the hidden side of a famously reclusive figure, one that involved elaborate schemes to obtain prescription drugs. Both men began a regiment of painkillers after an accident: Hughes' plane crash in 1946 and Jackson's burn on the set of a Pepsi commercial in 1984. Over time, each developed a tolerance for narcotics that enabled them to consume otherwise lethal doses.
What followed the death of Hughes, like many others each year, may very well follow Jackson's death: a criminal trial against one or more of the pop singer's doctors. Hughes' case wasn't the first and Jackson's certainly won't be the last. Such cases invariably shine a spotlight on medical ethics and the influence of celebrity.
The investigation in the Jackson case has so far focused on the star's personal cardiologist, Dr. Conrad Murray, who was present when Jackson died.
Dr. Forest Tennant served as an expert witness in the 1978 case against Dr. Wilbur Thain, who was accused of illegally prescribing Hughes, and the case in 1981 against Dr. George Nichopoulos, who was charged with over-prescribing Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis and seven others. Both doctors were acquitted of criminal charges and kept their medical licenses. A medical board later sanctioned Nichopoulos, dubbed "Dr. Nick" by the press, for ethical violations.
"Famous people like Jackson, Howard Hughes or Elvis Presley had enough money, enough privacy and severe enough medical problems that they had the need to have physicians at their beck and call," said Tennant, who treated his own share of famous people over the years as a Los Angeles physician and former medical director for the National Football League. "The willingness of physicians to take on this role, in my experience, is tantamount always to having to violate ethical standards."
For a physician to be convicted of criminal wrongdoing, the prosecution must prove that the doctor willfully over-prescribed drugs or knew that prescriptions were falsified. For instance, California authorities earlier this year charged two doctors who cared for actress and model Anna Nicole Smith, who died of a drug overdose in 2007, in part because the doctors allegedly wrote prescriptions for Smith under pseudonyms.
"When physicians get put in these positions, corners are going to be cut," Tennant said. "It's pretty obvious right now these things happened in the Jackson case."
How else to explain at Jackson's bedside bottles of the anesthesia drug Diprivan (brand name Propofol), which under normal circumstances doesn't leave the hospital?
"It's absolutely out of this universe," said Dr. Lynn Webster, who publishes a guide for practitioners called Avoiding Opioid Abuse While Managing Pain and is on the board of Zero Unintentional Deaths, which works "to eliminate the harm and unintended deaths associated with prescription pain relievers." Webster said for a patient to reasonably require Diprivan as a painkiller, he would have to be terminally ill and paraplegic.
"If what I hear out of the news is remotely correct, this is an individual who has become really addicted to multiple medications and cannot escape this without continued feeding of near lethal levels of medications," Webster said. "The window between what Michael wanted or felt like he needed and death was probably very narrow."
Unlike the Hughes case, the legal and regulatory machinery in the aftermath of Jackson's death has yet to complete its mission. Still, some clues can be divined from various media reports. According to TMZ.com, a former Jackson bodyguard told investigators that Jackson was taking 10 Xanax pills per night. The same bodyguard said at one time Jackson might have taken 30 to 40 pills per night of the anti-anxiety medication.
"There is no one who should ever have 10 Xanax a night even if that's the only thing he's taking," Webster said. Press reports following a search of Jackson's home also indicated he was taking a host of other painkillers including Demerol and Oxycontin, some in his name, others without labels or under different names. Assistants were said to obtain drugs from multiple pharmacies.
In 1978, the trial against Thain revealed similar plots by Howard Hughes. The subject line of a 1958 "operating memorandum" submitted as evidence in the trial and obtained courtesy of Tennant says, "Instructions from HRH regarding securing and processing prescriptions."
"When the call comes in to the office following the doctor's call to Mrs. Hughes and it is something that can be telephoned in, then OK," the memo reads. "Try to prevail on the doctor not to require a confirmation of the prescription. It would be well to put the prescription in Mrs. Melba Doss' name, as Mrs. Hughes would like that better than using another name she doesn't know."
Webster sympathized with doctors who get lured into the world of celebrity. "It's unfortunate because physicians can sometimes get pulled into situations like this that seem to be very exciting because of the people they are working with, and they forget the principles they are supposed to follow," he said.
Based on media reports, Jackson saw more than a dozen doctors since 1993. The Los Angeles Times quotes a longtime Jackson associate as saying the pop singer had little trouble finding a doctor who would prescribe drugs.
"They rotate in and out," the article quoted the source, who requested anonymity. "There were a lot of doctors over the years. ... They liked to be known as Michael Jackson's doctor."
Investigators in recent weeks subpoenaed medical records from multiple doctors who treated the singer, including Dr. Arnold Klein, Jackson's dermatologist for nearly 25 years.
Webster advises doctors who prescribe controlled substances to maintain detailed medical records and visit personally with patients to closely monitor their condition. "All of us get fooled, but the good physicians are always on guard for individuals who are out there to try and deceive them. For somebody to be deceived for 10 years would be extraordinary."
And of course, such abuse is not solely the province of celebrities. More than 8,500 Americans died from prescription drug overdoses in 2005, the latest year figures were available, according to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. From 2001 to 2005, unintentional overdose deaths due to prescription drugs increased 114 percent.
Public policy and drug enforcement actions over the past decade to combat abuse of painkillers have led to prescription drug monitoring programs in 33 states, including California. The programs work by tracking prescriptions of controlled substances through pharmacies.
To avoid detection, doctors might stockpile drugs in their office. Using aliases and diverting drugs from other patients are difficult to detect. And doctors might choose to skimp on the note taking in the name of privacy, especially when it comes to extremely reclusive figures such as Jackson and Hughes.
Their deaths took place in far different eras more than 30 years apart, but the issues remain the same when doctors succumb to the influence of celebrity. Early autopsy results said track marks scarred Jackson's arms. The autopsy of Hughes revealed a much more shocking detail: Five glass syringes, used to inject codeine, were found embedded in his upper and lower arm.
Warren Zevon's The Wind "sardonic wit and blazing intelligence"
Warren Zevon's The Wind
Warren Zevon was an American singer-songwriter known for his "sardonic wit and blazing intelligence" which he incorporated into his music. Some of his well known songs include "Werewolves of London", "Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner", and "Lawyers, Guns and Money". In 2002, Zevon was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He refused any treatment and started on his final album The Wind.The Wind features guest appearances from several of Zevon's close friends (Tom Petty, Bruce Springsteen, Don Henley to name a few). The making of the album was made into a documentary for VH1 entitled, Warren Zevon: Keep Me In Your Heart.
When I first heard The Wind, I knew it was Zevon's final album, made while he was dying, and so I listened to it differently than I would other albums. It seems to frequently refer to Zevon's illness (but maybe that's just me). Some songs seemed to contain a lot of regret.
Included on the album is a cover of the Bob Dylan song "Knockin' on Heaven's Door". (Not hard to see how this one relates to dyint.) Another song, "Disorder in the House" (recorded with Bruce Springsteen and winner of a Grammy for Best Rock Performance by a Duo or Group With Vocal), is about a house coming apart and falling down. It starts with the lines:
Disorder in the house
The tub runneth over
Plaster's falling down in pieces by the couch of pain
It ends:
Disorder in the house
All bets are off
I'm sprawled across the davenport of despair
Disorder in the house
I'll live with the losses
And watch the sundown through the portiere
Below is "Keep Me in Your Heart" also from The Wind.
Shortly after his diagnosis, in 2002, Zevon appeared on The Late Show with David Letterman as the only guest for an entire hour (most of the appearance can be seen on You Tube). Zevon was a frequent guest on The Late Show. When discussing his cancer, Zevon says,"I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years. It was one of those phobias that really didn't pay off." Later on, Letterman asks Zevon if he knows something about life and death that Letterman doesn't know. Zevon responds, "Not unless I know how much you're supposed to enjoy every sandwich." (The line "enjoy every sandwich" then became one of Zevon's more famous lines.)
Warren Zevon died September 7, 2003, less than two weeks after the release of The Wind on August 26th.
New Twitter Research: Men Follow Men and Nobody Tweets - Conversation Starter - HarvardBusiness.org
New Twitter Research: Men Follow Men and Nobody Tweets - Conversation Starter - HarvardBusiness.orgNew Twitter Research: Men Follow Men and Nobody Tweets
Twitter has attracted tremendous attention from the media and celebrities, but there is much uncertainty about Twitter's purpose. Is Twitter a communications service for friends and groups, a means of expressing yourself freely, or simply a marketing tool?
We examined the activity of a random sample of 300,000 Twitter users in May 2009 to find out how people are using the service. We then compared our findings to activity on other social networks and online content production venues. Our findings are very surprising.
Of our sample (300,542 users, collected in May 2009), 80% are followed by or follow at least one user. By comparison, only 60 to 65% of other online social networks' members had at least one friend (when these networks were at a similar level of development). This suggests that actual users (as opposed to the media at large) understand how Twitter works.
Although men and women follow a similar number of Twitter users, men have 15% more followers than women. Men also have more reciprocated relationships, in which two users follow each other. This "follower split" suggests that women are driven less by followers than men, or have more stringent thresholds for reciprocating relationships. This is intriguing, especially given that females hold a slight majority on Twitter: we found that men comprise 45% of Twitter users, while women represent 55%. To get this figure, we cross-referenced users' "real names" against a database of 40,000 strongly gendered names.
Even more interesting is who follows whom. We found that an average man is almost twice more likely to follow another man than a woman. Similarly, an average woman is 25% more likely to follow a man than a woman. Finally, an average man is 40% more likely to be followed by another man than by a woman. These results cannot be explained by different tweeting activity - both men and women tweet at the same rate.
These results are stunning given what previous research has found in the context of online social networks. On a typical online social network, most of the activity is focused around women - men follow content produced by women they do and do not know, and women follow content produced by women they knowi. Generally, men receive comparatively little attention from other men or from women. We wonder to what extent this pattern of results arises because men and women find the content produced by other men on Twitter more compelling than on a typical social network, and men find the content produced by women less compelling (because of a lack of photo sharing, detailed biographies, etc.).
Twitter's usage patterns are also very different from a typical on-line social network. A typical Twitter user contributes very rarely. Among Twitter users, the median number of lifetime tweets per user is one. This translates into over half of Twitter users tweeting less than once every 74 days.
At the same time there is a small contingent of users who are very active. Specifically, the top 10% of prolific Twitter users accounted for over 90% of tweets. On a typical online social network, the top 10% of users account for 30% of all production. To put Twitter in perspective, consider an unlikely analogue - Wikipedia. There, the top 15% of the most prolific editors account for 90% of Wikipedia's edits ii. In other words, the pattern of contributions on Twitter is more concentrated among the few top users than is the case on Wikipedia, even though Wikipedia is clearly not a communications tool. This implies that Twitter's resembles more of a one-way, one-to-many publishing service more than a two-way, peer-to-peer communication network.
Bill Heil is a graduating MBA student at Harvard Business School, and will start at Adobe Systems as a Product Manager in the fall. Mikolaj Jan Piskorski is an Assistant Professor of Strategy at HBS who teaches a Second Year elective entitled Competing with Social Networks. Bill undertook research for parts of this article in the context of that class.
i Piskorski, Mikolaj Jan. "Networks as covers: Evidence from an on-line social network." Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
ii Piskorski, Mikolaj Jan and Andreea Gorbatai, "Social structure of collaboration on Wikipedia." Working Paper, Harvard Business School.