Message from LSU President William F. Tate IV
Presidential Retweet Response Commitment from LSU President of LSU ("I Read Through Every Word")
my reply
.@LSUpresident Honored I @LSU #TitleIX inspired you #calltoaction on @Twitter @instagram @LinkedInhttps://twitter.com/mrjyn/status/1446482223692230657/9:26 AM Oct 8 #Tweet@WFTate4 followers and mine https://visualguidanceltd.blogspot.com/2021/10/i-read-through-every-word-shared-by.html@mrjyn love your spirithttps://www.instagram.com/p/CUxlSWcF8ZL/https://www.linkedin.com/posts/williamftateiv_activity-6852285682103197696-Qix8 11:14 PM · Oct 10, 2021
#LSUBOS refused to investigate #LSUGradstudent #dEspalungue after 1ere #rape. Let him #polanski a @France w/ more charges. @LSUstudents thought @LSUDiversity CASE WOULD FIND HELP (@usdepted DO NOT). NOW @WFTate4 @LSUpresident can make IT #TitleIX complianthttps://t.co/IHw9go1okc pic.twitter.com/YyFW5etYH8
— mrjyn (@mrjyn) October 8, 2021
(LinkedIn) doug meet
Message William F. Tate IV
So honored I could inspire you with my call to action in my tweet to your Twitter accounts
Between obligation and harm reduction this peremptory Social Media commitment of fidelity from Office of Louisiana State University president William Tate IV, expresses competent autonomy and tense moral imperative toward the fight against sexual predation on LSU campuses.
Muffled by diligent adherence to his own influence, he avoids conflict by peremptory abidance to the upcoming court case in a lawsuit filed by victims of the French citizen and LSU French Language Graduate School Student, who preyed on LSU students and is charged with raping at least one, controversially, not being investigated by either police enforcement, nor LSU Board of Supervisors. He was allowed to return to France as a student, and had not been heard from since.
This exacted 'presidential' imperative contrasts strongly to reported LSU Executive inaction, failing protect students in #TitleIX negligence, from sexual violence, whose company was not small--including receiving a Baton Rouge Mayoral appointment, and the usual palavering, failures of police attention or Justice, and by, ultimately, the state's highest gubernatorial appointed LSU Board of Supervisors'.
Le fin n'est jamais 'le fin' jusqu'à ce que quelqu'un pleure.
And for an encore, he gave away the rest to two LSU football players, blah blah ... just doing Psychopath, Fratboy, Altarboy Shit, INSTAGRAM!
In middle-aged gallimaufry of taboo, cringy crime--which local Catholic Clergy were thinking, like after their little problem, ("Oh Jesus. Keep your friends close. Pope J.P. makes us look like, priests. Phew. Pass the Sacrament, father).
He probably still harasses them in his life of House Arrest (Gosh, his wife AND twin brother must be so proud to see the little ginger Dickens home from Club Fed on acounta da COVID-19! "Can you believe, I finally get to be YOUR Ball and Chain. Where's my little Catholic rollover, hon? I left it next to my 'Geaux to Sleep' book. Honey?).
But I was saying ... to this somehow irresistible Gallic cur from the Molest Banquet on the Quay de Sin, whose Modes Operand i duplicitous praying on Cajun French demimonde, after Cotillion. This greasy bandeaux Franco-Baise Coward made men and women spit on drapeau during Piaf's play after Le Marseillaise,
But High School French students--this is sometimes indicative of more pernicious and lascivious , no not pedophilia, quite, but its older brother, Hebephilia, that certain penchant for that certain je ne say what Humbert Squared, fawnlet preoccupation whose knowledge of the Hot 100 is as adept as his knowledge of the local State code of female assayed legal fecundity... sick pedophile, i mean, hebephile shit like that.
Comment a-t-il séduit les filles de 18 ans ? Était-ce le malheur de minuit - son lâche viol. Certainement pas l'influence d'un Maître Français.How did he seduce the 18-year-old girls? Was it midnight's misfortune - his cowardly rape. Certainly not the influence of a French Master.Lycéens français. La Nuit du Film Français. Imputation d'accréditation bon marché. Le fin n'est jamais 'le fin' jusqu'à ce que quelqu'un pleure.High school French students. Le French Film Night. Imputation of cheap credentialing. Le fin is never 'le fin' until someone cries.
Principles of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association
Preamble
The medical profession has long subscribed to a body of ethical statements developed primarily for the benefit of the patient. As a member of this profession, a physician must recognize responsibility to patients first and foremost, as well as to society, to other health professionals, and to self. The following Principles adopted by the American Medical Association are not laws, but standards of conduct which define the essentials of honorable behavior for the physician.
arbitrary decisions to exclude a person seeking mental health treatment based on information obtained through dubious means which may or may not be correct further stigmatizes and discriminates, penalizes patients for behaviors that could be the result of illness, and decreases access to care, in direct contravention of Principles enjoining physicians / psychiatrists to "... support access to medical care for all people," and “[b]e dedicated to providing competent medical care with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights” sections 1, 2 and 9 (PMEAEAP 2021 Ed)
1. The requirement that the physician conduct himself/herself with propriety in his or her
profession and in all the actions of his or her life is especially important in the case of the
psychiatrist because the patient tends to model his or her behavior after that of his or her
psychiatrist by identification. Further, the necessary intensity of the treatment relationship may
tend to activate sexual and other needs and fantasies on the part of both patient and psychiatrist,
while weakening the objectivity necessary for control. Additionally, the inherent inequality in the
doctor-patient relationship may lead to exploitation of the patient. Sexual activity with a current
or former patient is unethical.
good practice for the outpatient
psychiatrist to be informed of the patient’s hospitalization by the inpatient team. Such notification respects
interprofessional relationships and often yields useful clinical information for inpatient treatment planning.
In this situation, if the psychiatrist documents the substance use, there is a risk that
the therapeutic alliance will be damaged and that the patient will not receive treatment. A psychiatrist may
address this tension in this case by noting that the patient has requested privacy regarding questions about
substance use, while continuing to work with the patient towards treatment goals. The psychiatrist should not
place false information in the chart. In the case of clinically relevant information, the information should not be
omitted without comment.
It is also customary that the patient is redirected to the outpatient psychiatrist for follow up care after discharge.
It should be noted, however, that the preference of the patient is relevant. A patient who has been admitted
under the care of an inpatient psychiatrist may choose not to consent to the release of medical information to
his/her outpatient psychiatrist, and also may choose not to return to this psychiatrist’s care. When making such
a choice, the patient is entitled to confidentiality. (Section 2) (2005; Rev. 2017)
https://youtu.be/WbWe-_jZEeQ
A physician shall be dedicated to providing competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human
dignity and rights.
1. Psychiatric records, including even the identification of a person as a patient, must be
protected with extreme care. Confidentiality is essential to psychiatric treatment. This is based in
part on the special nature of psychiatric therapy as well as on the traditional ethical relationship
between physician and patient. Growing concern regarding the civil rights of patients and the
possible adverse effects of computerization, duplication equipment, and data banks makes the
dissemination of confidential information an increasing hazard. Because of the sensitive and
private nature of the information with which the psychiatrist deals, he or she must be circumspect
in the information that he or she chooses to disclose to others about a patient. The welfare of the
patient must be a continuing consideration.
2. A psychiatrist may release confidential information only with the authorization of the
patient or under proper legal compulsion. The continuing duty of the psychiatrist to protect the
patient includes fully apprising him/her of the connotations of waiving the privilege of privacy.
This may become an issue when the patient is being investigated by a government agency, is
applying for a position, or is involved in legal action. The same principles apply to the release of
information concerning treatment to medical departments of government agencies, business or- ganizations, labor unions, and insurance companies. Information gained in confidence about
patients seen in student health services should not be released without the students’ explicit
permission.
a. Any treatment of a patient being supervised may be deleteriously affected.
b. It may damage the trust relationship between teacher and student.
c. Teachers are important professional role models for their trainees and affect their
trainees’ future professional behavior.
Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry
A physician shall uphold the standards of professionalism, be honest in all professional interactions, and strive to
report physicians deficient in character or competence, or engaging in fraud or deception, to appropriate entities.
The continuing duty of the psychiatrist to protect the
patient includes fully apprising him/her of the connotations of waiving the privilege of privacy.
This may become an issue when the patient is being investigated by a government agency, is
applying for a position, or is involved in legal action. The same principles apply to the release of
information concerning treatment to medical departments of government agencies, business or-
ganizations, labor unions, and insurance companies. Information gained in confidence about
patients seen in student health services should not be released without the students’ explicit
permission. situations in which an abuse of power can occur, often takes advantage of inequalities in
the working relationship and may be unethical because:
If asked or incentivized to do things more for their own or the organization's interests than those of their
patients, psychiatrists should advocate within the organization by making the best arguments they can for
organizational policy change (including arguments based on scientific data as well as on professional ethics). And,
of course, there could be circumstances egregious enough that the ethical psychiatrist might need to consider
leaving such an organization. (Section 1) (2020A physician shall uphold the standards of professionalism, be honest in all professional
interactions and strive to report physicians deficient in character or competence, or engaging in
fraud or deception to appropriate entities.
Section 3
A physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient.
Clinical and other materials used in teaching and writing must be adequately disguised in order to preserve the anonymity of the individuals involved.
Section 4
A physician shall respect the rights of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals, and shall safeguard patient confidences and privacy within the constraints of the law.
A physician shall respect the rights of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals, and shall safeguard patient confidences and privacy within the constraints of the law.
Section 5 Ethically, the psychiatrist may disclose only that information which is relevant to a given situation. He or she should avoid offering speculation as fact. Sensitive information such as an individual’s sexual orientation or fantasy material is usually unnecessary
A physician shall continue to study, apply, and advance scientific knowledge, maintain a commitment to medical education, make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public, obtain consultation, and use the talents of other health professionals when indicated.
Psychiatric services, like all medical services, are dispensed in the context of a contractual arrangement between the patient and the physician. The provisions of the contractual arrangement, which are binding on the physician as well as on the patient, should be explicitly established.
6. A physician shall, in the provision of appropriate patient care, except in emergencies, be free to choose whom to serve, with whom to associate, and the environment in which to provide medical care.
It is ethical for the psychiatrist to make a charge for a missed appointment when this falls within the terms of the specific contractual agreement with the patient. Charging for a missed appointment or for one not canceled 24 hours in advance need not, in itself, be considered unethical if a patient is fully advised that the physician will make such a charge. The practice, however, should be resorted to infrequently and always with the utmost consideration for the patient and his or her circumstances.
Section 7 A physician shall recognize a responsibility to participate in activities contributing to the improvement of the community and the betterment of public health.
Section 8 A physician shall, while caring for a patient, regard responsibility to the patient as paramount. Section 9 A physician shall support access to medical care for all people.
In addition, arbitrary decisions to exclude a person seeking mental health treatment based on information obtained through dubious means, which may or may not be correct, further stigmatizes and discriminates against psychiatric patients, penalizes such patients for behaviors that could be the result of mental illness and significantly decreases access to care. This is in direct contravention of Section 9 of the Principles which enjoins physicians/psychiatrists to "...support access to medical care for all people." Likewise, Section 1 states: “A physician shall be dedicated to providing competent medical care with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights”. (Sections 1, 2 and 9) (2020)
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System (FMOLHS-
OLOLRMC) Medical Ethicist specializing in Consumer
Abandonment, Malfeasance, Malicious Termination, Cherrypicking,
Lemondropping, Due Process, Appeal, Think Tank
Baton Rouge
YG Entertainment ♀️Jisoo Jennie Lisa ROSÉ まじ可愛かった （＞＜。）❤️ . . .
Experience Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System 5 months Hospitalist June 2021 - Present (5 months) Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States Medical Advisor
June 2021 - Present (5 months) Baton Rouge Metropolitan Area Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System (FMOLHS-OLOLRMC) Medical Ethicist specializing in Consumer Abandonment, Malfeasance, Malicious Termination, Cherrypicking-Lemondropping Due Process Appeal Think Tank
SMC Hotels Group Eviction Moratorium Pandemic Think Tank December 2020 - Present (11 months)
